Making Research Count: What Australian Social Work Researchers Think

被引:3
|
作者
Heinsch, Milena [1 ]
Gray, Mel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
关键词
Research Use; Interaction; Social Work; Knowledge Utilisation; KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION; DISSEMINATION; DETERMINANTS; SCIENCE; PRACTITIONERS; DIFFUSION; FRAMEWORK; METAPHOR; MODEL; BASE;
D O I
10.1080/0312407X.2016.1143518
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
A central question in the research utilisation literature is what happens to research evidence once it is produced. In social work, this has frequently translated to questions of whether and how social workers use research in practice. Despite these questions, relatively little is known about the ways in which research comes to be used in social work practice. This paper reports on a study of research utilisation in social work, which examined researchers' perceptions of the factors impacting on research use in social work. The specific focus of this study was on the impact of interaction between researchers and practitioners on research use in practice. The study replicated a scale used in prior studies on knowledge utilisation to collect data from 60 Australian researchers publishing in social work journals, all of whom reported some level of research use by practitioners. Key variables were coproduction, engagement, and research utilisation. Implications for future use of the survey instrument for the measurement and implementation of research use in social work are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:428 / 442
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] The capability approach in social work research: A scoping review of research addressing practical social work
    Kjellberg, Inger
    Jansson, Birgitta
    INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL WORK, 2022, 65 (02) : 224 - 239
  • [43] Health systems and policy research evidence in health policy making in Israel: what are researchers' practices in transferring knowledge to policy makers?
    Ellen, Moriah E.
    Lavis, John N.
    Sharon, Assaf
    Shemer, Joshua
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2014, 12
  • [44] Client access to case records in Australian social work
    Yu, Nilan
    INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL WORK, 2019, 62 (01) : 8 - 21
  • [45] METHODOLOGIES FOR ETHICAL DECISION MAKING IN SOCIAL WORK
    Uriz, Maria-Jesus
    Idareta, Francisco
    Viscarret, Juan-Jesus
    Ballestero, Alberto
    LJETOPIS SOCIJALNOG RADA, 2017, 24 (01): : 33 - 54
  • [46] What is social about social perception research?
    Teufel, Christoph
    Hagen, Elisabeth von Dem
    Plaisted-Grant, Kate C.
    Edmonds, James J.
    Ayorinde, John O.
    Fletcher, Paul C.
    Davis, Greg
    FRONTIERS IN INTEGRATIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 6
  • [47] Advancing scholarship on rural social work in China: published researchers' perspectives
    Meng, Qian
    Gray, Mel
    Bradt, Lieve
    Roets, Griet
    ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK AND DEVELOPMENT, 2024,
  • [48] Positioning Social Work Researchers for Engaged Scholarship to Promote Public Impact
    Jensen, Todd M.
    Kainz, Kirsten
    JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SOCIAL WORK AND RESEARCH, 2019, 10 (04) : 591 - 609
  • [49] YOUTH AND FAMILY IN A CRISIS SITUATION - A CONTEXT TO THINK ON SOCIAL WORK INTERVENTION
    Gallego Castano, Giovani
    ELEUTHERA, 2008, 2 : 115 - 129
  • [50] From Neuroscientific Research Findings to Social Work Practice: A Critical Description of the Knowledge Utilisation Process
    Plafky, Christina S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2016, 46 (06) : 1502 - 1519