Psychological safety in feedback: What does it look like and how can educators work with learners to foster it?

被引:76
作者
Johnson, Christina E. [1 ,2 ]
Keating, Jennifer L. [3 ]
Molloy, Elizabeth K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Monash Hlth, Monash Doctors Educ, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Med Sch, Dept Med Educ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Sch Primary & Allied Hlth Care, Dept Physiotherapy, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT; EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE; PERCEPTIONS; HIERARCHY; CULTURE; MODEL; POWER;
D O I
10.1111/medu.14154
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Context Feedback conversations play a central role in health professions workplace learning. However, learners face a dilemma: if they engage in productive learning behaviours (such as asking questions, raising difficulties, offering opinions or contesting ideas), they risk exposing their limitations or offending the educator. This highlights the importance of psychological safety in encouraging learners to candidly engage in interactive dialogue and the co-construction of knowledge. Previous research has recommended that building safety, trust or an educational alliance is key to productive feedback encounters. Yet it is unclear how to translate this into practice. Hence our research question was: What does psychological safety look like in workplace feedback and how can educators work with learners to foster it? Methods We analysed 36 videos of routine formal feedback episodes in clinical practice involving diverse health professionals. A psychologically safe learning environment was inferred when learners progressively disclosed information and engaged in productive learning behaviours during the conversation. We used thematic analysis to identify associated educator strategies, which seemed to promote psychological safety. Results Four themes were identified: (a) setting the scene for dialogue and candour; (b) educator as ally; (c) a continuing improvement orientation, and (d) encouraging interactive dialogue. Educators approaches captured within these themes, seemed to foster a psychologically safe environment by conveying a focus on learning, and demonstrating respect and support to learners. Conclusions This study builds on claims regarding the importance of psychological safety in feedback by clarifying what psychological safety in workplace feedback conversations might look like and identifying associated educator approaches. The results may offer educators practical ways they could work with learners to encourage candid dialogue focused on improving performance.
引用
收藏
页码:559 / 570
页数:12
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Researching feedback dialogue: an interactional analysis approach [J].
Ajjawi, Rola ;
Boud, David .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2017, 42 (02) :252-265
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Clinical education in the health professions
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, QUALITATIVE DATA ANA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Human fallibility. Professional and practice-based learning
[5]   Identifying coaching skills to improve feedback use in postgraduate medical education [J].
Armson, Heather ;
Lockyer, Jocelyn M. ;
Zetkulic, Marygrace ;
Koenings, Karen D. ;
Sargeant, Joan .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 53 (05) :477-493
[6]   Intellectual streaking: The value of teachers exposing minds (and hearts) [J].
Bearman, Margaret ;
Molloy, Elizabeth .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2017, 39 (12) :1284-1285
[7]   Feedback falling on deaf ears: Residents' receptivity to feedback tempered by sender credibility [J].
BingYou, RG ;
Paterson, J ;
Levine, MA .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 1997, 19 (01) :40-44
[8]   Verbal Interaction Analysis: Viewing Feedback Through a Different Lens [J].
Blatt, Benjamin ;
Confessore, Sharon ;
Kallenberg, Gene ;
Greenberg, Larrie .
TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 2008, 20 (04) :329-333
[9]   A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews [J].
Boeije, H .
QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2002, 36 (04) :391-409
[10]  
Boud D., 2013, Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well, P1