Decision-Making Techniques for Software Architecture Design: A Comparative Survey

被引:87
作者
Falessi, Davide [1 ]
Cantone, Giovanni [1 ]
Kazman, Rick [2 ,3 ]
Kruchten, Philippe [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Informat Syst & Prod Engn, I-00133 Rome, Italy
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Inst Software Engn, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Univ Hawaii, Shidler Coll, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[4] Univ British Columbia, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
关键词
Design; Decision-making; architecture; design decisions;
D O I
10.1145/1978802.1978812
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
The architecture of a software-intensive system can be defined as the set of relevant design decisions that affect the qualities of the overall system functionality; therefore, architectural decisions are eventually crucial to the success of a software project. The software engineering literature describes several techniques to choose among architectural alternatives, but it gives no clear guidance on which technique is more suitable than another, and in which circumstances. As such, there is no systematic way for software engineers to choose among decision-making techniques for resolving tradeoffs in architecture design. In this article, we provide a comparison of existing decision-making techniques, aimed to guide architects in their selection. The results show that there is no "best" decision-making technique; however, some techniques are more susceptible to specific difficulties. Hence architects should choose a decision-making technique based on the difficulties that they wish to avoid. This article represents a first attempt to reason on meta-decision-making, that is, the issue of deciding how to decide.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], CTR QUALITY MANAG J
  • [2] [Anonymous], P 18 INT C SOFTW ENG
  • [3] [Anonymous], P INT C SOFTW ENG FU
  • [4] [Anonymous], P 1 EUR WORKSH SOFTW
  • [5] [Anonymous], P 2 INT WORKSH CBSE
  • [6] [Anonymous], TSE0401 KEEL U
  • [7] [Anonymous], P 1 EUR C SOFTW ARCH
  • [8] [Anonymous], P SOFW CONTR METR SO
  • [9] [Anonymous], P 6 WORK IEEE IFIP C
  • [10] [Anonymous], P 5 WORK IEEE IFIP C