Effect of Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection on Oncologic Outcomes in Patients with D'Amico Intermediate and High Risk Prostate Cancer Treated with Radical Prostatectomy: A Multi-Institutional Study

被引:62
|
作者
Preisser, Felix [1 ,3 ]
van den Bergh, Roderick C. N. [4 ]
Gandaglia, Giorgio [5 ]
Ost, Piet [6 ]
Surcel, Christian I. [7 ]
Sooriakumaran, Prasanna [8 ]
Montorsi, Francesco [5 ]
Graefen, Markus [1 ]
van der Poel, Henk [4 ]
de la Taille, Alexandre [9 ]
Briganti, Alberto [5 ]
Salomon, Laurent [9 ]
Ploussard, Guillaume [9 ,10 ,11 ]
Tilki, Derya [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Prostate Canc Ctr, Martini Klin, Martinistr 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Urol, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
[4] Antonius Hosp, Dept Urol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] IRCCS Osped San Raffaele, Div Oncol, URI, Unit Urol, Milan, Italy
[6] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, Ghent, Belgium
[7] Fundeni Clin Inst, Ctr Urol Surg Dialysis & Renal Transplantat, Bucharest, Romania
[8] Univ Coll London Hosp, Dept Urooncol, London, England
[9] Henri Mondor Hosp, AP HP, Dept Urol, Creteil, France
[10] La Croix Sud Hosp, Dept Urol, Toulouse, France
[11] Inst Univ Canc Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; neoplasm metastasis; lymph node excision; mortality; IMPROVES SURVIVAL; LYMPHADENECTOMY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/JU.0000000000000504
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Pelvic lymph node dissection represents the gold standard of lymph node staging in patients with prostate cancer. We sought to assess the effect of extended pelvic lymph node dissection on oncologic outcomes in patients with characteristics of D'Amico intermediate or high risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: In a multi-institutional database of 4 centers we identified 9,742 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy from 2000 to 2017 with or without pelvic lymph node dissection. Only patients with a greater than 5% probability of lymph node invasion according to the Briganti nomogram were included in study. We performed 2:1 propensity score matching to account for potential differences between the 2 cohorts. Cox regression models were used to test the effect of pelvic lymph node dissection on biochemical recurrence, metastasis and cancer specific mortality. Results: Overall 707 patients (7.3%) did not undergo pelvic lymph node dissection, of whom 520 and 187 harbored D'Amico intermediate and high risk characteristics, respectively. A median of 14 lymph nodes (IQR 8-21) were removed in the pelvic lymph node dissection cohort and 1,714 of these cases (19.0%) harbored lymph node metastasis. After propensity score matching the biochemical recurrence-free, metastasis-free and cancer specific mortality-free survival rates were 60.4% vs 65.6% (p = 0.07), 87.0% vs 90.0% (p=0.06) and 95.2% vs 96.4% (p = 0.2) for pelvic lymph node dissection vs no pelvic lymph node dissection 120 months after radical prostatectomy. Multivariable Cox regression models adjusted for postoperative and preoperative tumor characteristics revealed that pelvic lymph node dissection performed at radical prostatectomy was no independent predictor of biochemical recurrence, metastasis or cancer specific mortality (all p >= 0.1). Conclusions: There was no significant difference in oncologic outcomes in patients with D'Amico high or intermediate risk prostate cancer in whom pelvic lymph node dissection was or was not performed at radical prostatectomy. The therapeutic value of pelvic lymph node dissection remains unclear.
引用
收藏
页码:338 / 343
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The impact of extended lymph node dissection versus neoadjuvant therapy with limited lymph node dissection on biochemical recurrence in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis
    Narita, Takuma
    Koie, Takuya
    Ookubo, Teppei
    Mitsuzuka, Koji
    Narita, Shintaro
    Yamamoto, Hayato
    Inoue, Takamitsu
    Hatakeyama, Shingo
    Kawamura, Sadafumi
    Tochigi, Tatsuo
    Habuchi, Tomonori
    Arai, Yoichi
    Ohyama, Chikara
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 34 (01)
  • [2] The impact of extended lymph node dissection versus neoadjuvant therapy with limited lymph node dissection on biochemical recurrence in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis
    Takuma Narita
    Takuya Koie
    Teppei Ookubo
    Koji Mitsuzuka
    Shintaro Narita
    Hayato Yamamoto
    Takamitsu Inoue
    Shingo Hatakeyama
    Sadafumi Kawamura
    Tatsuo Tochigi
    Tomonori Habuchi
    Yoichi Arai
    Chikara Ohyama
    Medical Oncology, 2017, 34
  • [3] Therapeutic Value of Standard Versus Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Colicchia, Michele
    Sharma, Vidit
    Abdollah, Firas
    Briganti, Alberto
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2017, 18 (07)
  • [4] Identifying the Candidates Who Will Benefit From Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at Radical Prostatectomy Among Patients With Prostate Cancer
    Yang, Guanjie
    Xie, Jun
    Guo, Yadong
    Yuan, Jing
    Wang, Ruiliang
    Guo, Changcheng
    Peng, Bo
    Yao, Xudong
    Yang, Bin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 11
  • [5] Obesity does not increase the risk of lymph node metastases in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection
    Briganti, Alberto
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Chun, Felix K-H
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Gallina, Andrea
    Abdollah, Firas
    Freschi, Massimo
    Doglioni, Claudio
    Rigatti, Patrizio
    Montorsi, Francesco
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 16 (08) : 676 - 681
  • [6] Extended Versus Limited Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy for Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer: Early Oncological Outcomes from a Randomized Phase 3 Trial
    Lestingi, Jean F. P.
    Guglielmetti, Giuliano B.
    Trinh, Quoc-Dien
    Coelho, Rafael F.
    Pontes, Jose Jr Jr
    Bastos, Diogo A.
    Cordeiro, Mauricio D.
    Sarkis, Alvaro S.
    Faraj, Sheila F.
    Mitre, Anuar, I
    Srougi, Miguel
    Nahas, William C.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 (05) : 595 - 604
  • [7] Rate and Extent of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in the US Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Radical Prostatectomy
    Nocera, Luigi
    Sood, Akshay
    Dalela, Deepansh
    Gild, Philipp
    Rogers, Craig G.
    Peabody, James O.
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Menon, Mani
    Briganti, Alberto
    Abdollah, Firas
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2018, 16 (02) : E451 - E467
  • [8] Fluorescence Guided Targeted Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Intermediate and High Risk Prostate Cancer
    Hruby, Stephan
    Englberger, Christine
    Lusuardi, Lukas
    Schaetz, Tobias
    Kunit, Thomas
    Abdel-Aal, Ahmed Magdy
    Hager, Martina
    Janetschek, Guenter
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 194 (02) : 357 - 363
  • [9] The Role of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy in Patients With Gleason 6 Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer
    Mandel, Philipp
    Kriegmair, Maximilian C.
    Veleva, Valia
    Salomon, Georg
    Graefen, Markus
    Huland, Hartwig
    Tilki, Derya
    UROLOGY, 2016, 93 : 141 - 146
  • [10] Extended Lymph Node Dissection May Not Provide a Therapeutic Benefit in Patients with Intermediate-to High-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated with Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Miura, Noriyoshi
    Shimbo, Masaki
    Okawa, Dai
    Sakamoto, Miki
    Sugihara, Naoya
    Sawada, Takatora
    Haga, Shunsuke
    Arai, Haruna
    Nishida, Keigo
    Arai, Osuke
    Onishi, Tomoya
    Watanabe, Ryuta
    Nishimura, Kenichi
    Fukumoto, Tetsuya
    Miyauchi, Yuki
    Kikugawa, Tadahiko
    Nishino, Takato
    Endo, Fumiyasu
    Hattori, Kazunori
    Saika, Takashi
    CANCERS, 2025, 17 (04)