A New Approach Within ANP-SWOT Framework for Prioritization of Ecosystem Management and Case Study of National Park Djerdap, Serbia

被引:49
作者
Arsic, Sanela [1 ]
Nikolic, Djordje [1 ]
Mihajlovic, Ivan [1 ]
Fedajev, Aleksandra [1 ]
Zivkovic, Zivan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Belgrade, Tech Fac Bor, Engn Management Dept, Vojske Jugoslavije 12, Bor 19210, Serbia
关键词
Management of National Park; Strategic analysis; SWOT; MCDM; ANP method; SUSTAINABLE TOURISM DEVELOPMENT; NETWORK PROCESS; EVALUATION MODEL; PROTECTED AREAS; FUZZY ANP; ECOTOURISM; STRATEGIES; PERCEPTION; RESOURCES; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.10.006
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Complex National Park (NP) Management Problems often requires a multidisciplinary approach in the process of business decision-making involving various stakeholders from the region. In the decision-making process, the methodology, based on combining SWOT analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) and the Analytical Network Process (ANP) methods, has been proved as a very useful tool in numerous surveys as it is being presented in this paper on the example of the National Park Djerdap (NPDJ). In the conducted research, aimed to achieve business vision of this company, a four-phase decision making approach was defined. In the defined model, the situation SWOT analysis was used as the baseline in the analysis of the situation on the ground. Hence, four scenarios were generated by experts using the ANP method of multi-criteria decision making. The results obtained within the research identified the scenarios of the highest priority - sustainable development and environmental protection - which would enable the National Park Djerdap to achieve its vision. The proposed model is flexible in the sense that its network structure and rules allow minor adjustments for its application to similar problems in the environmental management in other protected natural areas.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 95
页数:11
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [1] Protected areas reduced poverty in Costa Rica and Thailand
    Andam, Kwaw S.
    Ferraro, Paul J.
    Sims, Katharine R. E.
    Healy, Andrew
    Holland, Margaret B.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (22) : 9996 - 10001
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2002, REV CURR APPR PERF M
  • [3] Visitors' satisfaction, perceptions and gap analysis: The case of Dadia-Lefkimi-Souflion National Park
    Arabatzis, Garyfallos
    Grigoroudis, Evangelos
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2010, 12 (03) : 163 - 172
  • [4] Relationships between national-park affinity and attitudes towards protected area management of visitors to the Gesaeuse National Park, Austria
    Arnberger, Arne
    Eder, Renate
    Allex, Brigitte
    Sterl, Petra
    Burns, Robert C.
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2012, 19 : 48 - 55
  • [5] Hybrid SWOT - ANP - FANP model for prioritization strategies of sustainable development of ecotourism in National Park Djerdap, Serbia
    Arsic, Sanela
    Nikolic, Djordje
    Zivkovic, Zivan
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2017, 80 : 11 - 26
  • [6] Utilization of natural and cultural resources of Dikili (Izmir) for tourism
    Ataberk, Emre
    Baykal, Fusun
    [J]. 2ND INTERNATIONAL GEOGRAPHY SYMPOSIUM-MEDITERRANEAN ENVIRONMENT 2010, 2011, 19 : 173 - 180
  • [7] Dealing with a multiple criteria environmental problem with interaction effects between criteria through an extension of the ELECTRE III method
    Bottero, M.
    Ferretti, V.
    Figueira, J. R.
    Greco, S.
    Roy, B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, 245 (03) : 837 - 850
  • [8] Bulatovic I., 2015, Turizam, V19, P127, DOI [10.5937/turizam1503127b, DOI 10.5937/TURIZAM1503127B]
  • [9] Chan R., 2013, South Asian Journal of Tourism and Heritage, V6, P69, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203047989
  • [10] Chase L.C., 2011, Handbook of Tourism and Quality of Life Research, P475