Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Among Healthcare Staff: A Qualitative Survey Study

被引:95
作者
Castagno, Simone [1 ]
Khalifa, Mohamed [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Free Hosp, Dept Intervent Radiol, London, England
来源
FRONTIERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | 2020年 / 3卷
关键词
artificial intelligence; healthcare; survey; questionnaire; online; perceptions; attitudes; public health; FUTURE;
D O I
10.3389/frai.2020.578983
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Objectives: The medical community is in agreement that artificial intelligence (AI) will have a radical impact on patient care in the near future. The purpose of this study is to assess the awareness of AI technologies among health professionals and to investigate their perceptions toward AI applications in medicine. Design: A web-based Google Forms survey was distributed via the Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust e-newsletter. Setting: Only staff working at the NHS Foundation Trust received an invitation to complete the online questionnaire. Participants: 98 healthcare professionals out of 7,538 (response rate 1.3%; CI 95%; margin of error 9.64%) completed the survey, including medical doctors, nurses, therapists, managers, and others. Primary outcome: To investigate the prior knowledge of health professionals on the subject of AI as well as their attitudes and worries about its current and future applications. Results: 64% of respondents reported never coming across applications of AI in their work and 87% did not know the difference between machine learning and deep learning, although 50% knew at least one of the two terms. Furthermore, only 5% stated using speech recognition or transcription applications on a daily basis, while 63% never utilize them. 80% of participants believed there may be serious privacy issues associated with the use of AI and 40% considered AI to be potentially even more dangerous than nuclear weapons. However, 79% also believed AI could be useful or extremely useful in their field of work and only 10% were worried AI will replace them at their job. Conclusions: Despite agreeing on the usefulness of AI in the medical field, most health professionals lack a full understanding of the principles of AI and are worried about potential consequences of its widespread use in clinical practice. The cooperation of healthcare workers is crucial for the integration of AI into clinical practice and without it the NHS may miss out on an exceptionally rewarding opportunity. This highlights the need for better education and clear regulatory frameworks.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Accenture, 2017, ARTIF INTELL
  • [2] Impact of artificial intelligence on radiology: a EuroAIM survey among members of the European Society of Radiology
    Brkljacic, Boris
    Derchi, Lorenzo E.
    Hamm, Bernd
    Fuchsjager, Michael
    Krestin, Gabriel
    Dewey, Marc
    Parizel, Paul
    Clark, Jonathan
    Codari, Marina
    Melazzini, Luca
    Morozov, Sergey P.
    van Kuijk, Cornelis C.
    Sconfienza, Luca M.
    Sardanelli, Francesco
    [J]. INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2019, 10 (01)
  • [3] Unintended Consequences of Machine Learning in Medicine
    Cabitza, Federico
    Rasoini, Raffaele
    Gensini, Gian Franco
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 318 (06): : 517 - 518
  • [4] Copeland B.J, 2020, Artificial intelligence
  • [5] A guide to deep learning in healthcare
    Esteva, Andre
    Robicquet, Alexandre
    Ramsundar, Bharath
    Kuleshov, Volodymyr
    DePristo, Mark
    Chou, Katherine
    Cui, Claire
    Corrado, Greg
    Thrun, Sebastian
    Dean, Jeff
    [J]. NATURE MEDICINE, 2019, 25 (01) : 24 - 29
  • [7] Forbes Insights, 2019, FORBES
  • [8] The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?
    Frey, Carl Benedikt
    Osborne, Michael A.
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2017, 114 : 254 - 280
  • [9] Hawking S., 2014, INDEPENDENT
  • [10] Against the iDoctor: why artificial intelligence should not replace physician judgment
    Karches, Kyle E.
    [J]. THEORETICAL MEDICINE AND BIOETHICS, 2018, 39 (02) : 91 - 110