How do people in the "Land of Hornbills" perceive Hornbills?

被引:5
作者
Philovenny, Pengiran [1 ]
Mohd-Azlan, Jayasilan [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIMAS, Kota Samarahan 94300, Sarawak, Malaysia
关键词
Hornbills; perception survey; conservation; western Sarawak; Boosted Regression Tree Modelling; CONSERVATION; EDUCATION; INFORM;
D O I
10.1017/S0959270921000381
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Sarawak is known as the "Land of Hornbills", having the Rhinoceros Hornbill as the state emblem and with hornbills also being closely associated with important cultural symbols and beliefs among various local communities. However, up to date there is limited understanding on the perception, awareness, and beliefs of local communities towards hornbills. This paper aims to describe the aforementioned factors in western Sarawak, in hope of acquiring the socio-cultural information needed to fill the gap, and to clarify misconceptions towards hornbill conservation efforts in Sarawak. Data collection was accomplished using Open Data Kit (ODK). A total of 500 respondents were approached in five administrative divisions in western Sarawak, namely Kuching, Samarahan, Serian, Sri Aman, and Betong. The questionnaire was carefully formulated to control acquiescence bias that might arise. Boosted Regression Tree (BRT) modelling was conducted to evaluate the strongest demographic predictor variables influencing the answers and word clouds were used to visualise hornbill species by the local community. Sarawakians acknowledge the importance of hornbills as a cultural symbol (95%) despite hornbills being used for food, medicine, and decoration. Whilst this study describes the perceptions of hornbills in local communities, a comprehensive assessment throughout Sarawak is recommended for better understanding of hornbill importance in other communities. Such socio-cultural information is vital to ensure the success of conservation efforts and for effective management strategies of hornbills within Sarawak.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 37 条
[11]   Best practices: social research methods to inform biological conservation [J].
Crandall, Sharifa G. ;
Ohayon, Jennifer L. ;
de Wit, Luz A. ;
Hammond, J. E. ;
Melanson, Kate L. ;
Moritsch, Monica M. ;
Davenport, Rob ;
Ruiz, Diana ;
Keitt, Bradford ;
Holmes, Nick D. ;
Packard, Heath G. ;
Bury, Jeffrey ;
Gilbert, Gregory S. ;
Parker, Ingrid M. .
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 25 (01) :6-23
[12]  
Datta A., 2007, P 4 INT HORNB WORKSH, P41
[13]  
Derwent Sue, 1997, Africa Birds & Birding, V2, P22
[14]  
Dhar U, 2002, CURR SCI INDIA, V82, P808
[15]   Prospects and challenges for social media data in conservation science [J].
Di Minin, Enrico ;
Tenkanen, Henrikki ;
Toivonen, Tuuli .
FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2015, 3
[16]  
Elands B.H.M., 2007, 5312 WETT OND NAT MI
[17]   A working guide to boosted regression trees [J].
Elith, J. ;
Leathwick, J. R. ;
Hastie, T. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2008, 77 (04) :802-813
[18]  
Engelbrecht D., 2007, P 4 INT HORNB WORKSH, P252
[19]   SOCIAL DESIRABILITY BIAS AND THE VALIDITY OF INDIRECT QUESTIONING [J].
FISHER, RJ .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1993, 20 (02) :303-315
[20]   A community-based wildlife survey: the knowledge and attitudes of residents of suburban Brisbane, with a focus on bandicoots [J].
FitzGibbon, Sean I. ;
Jones, Darryl N. .
WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2006, 33 (03) :233-241