How the value of the environment controls persistence in visual search

被引:4
作者
Traner, Michael R. [1 ]
Bromberg-Martin, Ethan S. [2 ]
Monosov, Ilya E. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Dept Neurosci, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Dept Neurosurg, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[4] Washington Univ, Pain Ctr, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[5] Washington Univ, Dept Elect Engn, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
关键词
MIDBRAIN DOPAMINE NEURONS; LATERAL HABENULA; RESPONSE LATENCY; BASAL GANGLIA; NEURAL CIRCUITRY; DECISION-MAKING; EYE-MOVEMENTS; REWARD; SIGNALS; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009662
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Author summaryClassic foraging theory predicts that humans and animals aim to gain maximum reward per unit time. However, in standard instrumental conditioning tasks individuals adopt an apparently suboptimal strategy: they respond slowly when the expected value is low. This reward-related bias is often explained as reduced motivation. Here we present evidence this behavior is associated with a complementary increased motivation to search the environment for alternatives. We found that the reward-related bias scaled with environment value, was in part caused by persistent searching after the target was already found, and was associated with increased exploration of objects in the environment. A novel computational model of foraging suggests that this search strategy would be adaptive in naturalistic settings where both environments and the objects within them provide partial information about hidden, uncertain rewards. Classic foraging theory predicts that humans and animals aim to gain maximum reward per unit time. However, in standard instrumental conditioning tasks individuals adopt an apparently suboptimal strategy: they respond slowly when the expected value is low. This reward-related bias is often explained as reduced motivation in response to low rewards. Here we present evidence this behavior is associated with a complementary increased motivation to search the environment for alternatives. We trained monkeys to search for reward-related visual targets in environments with different values. We found that the reward-related bias scaled with environment value, was consistent with persistent searching after the target was already found, and was associated with increased exploratory gaze to objects in the environment. A novel computational model of foraging suggests that this search strategy could be adaptive in naturalistic settings where both environments and the objects within them provide partial information about hidden, uncertain rewards.
引用
收藏
页数:34
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]   The attention habit: how reward learning shapes attentional selection [J].
Anderson, Brian A. .
YEAR IN COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 1369 :24-39
[2]   Value-driven attentional and oculomotor capture during goal-directed, unconstrained viewing [J].
Anderson, Brian A. ;
Yantis, Steven .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2012, 74 (08) :1644-1653
[3]   Of bits and wows: A Bayesian theory of surprise with applications to attention [J].
Baldi, Pierre ;
Itti, Laurent .
NEURAL NETWORKS, 2010, 23 (05) :649-666
[4]   Posterior Cingulate Neurons Dynamically Signal Decisions to Disengage during Foraging [J].
Barack, David L. ;
Chang, Steve W. C. ;
Platt, Michael L. .
NEURON, 2017, 96 (02) :339-+
[5]   Reward expectation differentially modulates attentional behavior and activity in visual area V4 [J].
Baruni, Jalal K. ;
Lau, Brian ;
Salzman, C. Daniel .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 18 (11) :1656-1663
[6]   Putting desire on a budget: dopamine and energy expenditure, reconciling reward and resources [J].
Beeler, Jeff A. ;
Frazier, Cristianne R. M. ;
Zhuang, Xiaoxi .
FRONTIERS IN INTEGRATIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 6
[7]   Dopamine Modulates Reward-Related Vigor [J].
Beierholm, Ulrik ;
Guitart-Masip, Marc ;
Economides, Marcos ;
Chowdhury, Rumana ;
Duezel, Emrah ;
Dolan, Ray ;
Dayan, Peter .
NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 38 (08) :1495-1503
[8]  
Benson KE, 1996, AM ZOOL, V36, P506
[9]   Monkeys Are More Patient in a Foraging Task than in a Standard Intertemporal Choice Task [J].
Blanchard, Tommy C. ;
Hayden, Benjamin Y. .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (02)
[10]   Neural circuitry of information seeking [J].
Bromberg-Martin, Ethan S. ;
Monosov, Ilya E. .
CURRENT OPINION IN BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2020, 35 :62-70