Preoperative Radiographic Assessment of Limb-length Discrepancy in Total Hip Arthroplasty

被引:125
作者
Meermans, Geert [1 ]
Malik, Ahmad [1 ]
Witt, Johan [1 ]
Haddad, Fares [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll London Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, London, England
关键词
LEG-LENGTH; PELVIC RADIOGRAPHS; NERVE PALSY; INEQUALITY; REPLACEMENT; EQUALIZATION; JOINT; BIOMECHANICS; OFFSET; TILT;
D O I
10.1007/s11999-010-1588-x
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Pelvic radiographs are helpful in assessing limb-length discrepancy (LLD) before and after THA but are subject to variation. Different methods are used to determine LLDs. As a pelvic reference, both ischial tuberosities and the teardrops are used, and as a femoral reference, the lesser trochanter and center of the femoral head are used. We validated the different methods for preoperative radiographic measurement of LLDs and evaluated their reliability. LLDs were measured on full-leg radiographs for 52 patients (29 men, 23 women) with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip and compared with different methods for measuring LLDs on AP radiographs of the pelvis. The true LLD varied from -8.0 to 9.1 mm. When the biischial line was used as a pelvic reference, the LLD measured on AP pelvis radiographs was different from the true LLD. No difference was found when the interteardrop line was used as a pelvic reference. There was substantial interobserver agreement when the lesser trochanter was used as a femoral reference (kappa = 0.66-0.70) and excellent interobserver and intraobserver agreement for all other measurements (kappa = 0.84-0.93). Our data show use of the biischial line as a pelvic reference should be discouraged and the interteardrop line is a better alternative. The center of the femoral head is a more reliable femoral landmark compared with the lesser trochanter. Level I, diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:1677 / 1682
页数:6
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
ABRAHAM WD, 1992, ORTHOP CLIN N AM, V23, P201
[2]   Stability and leg length equality in total hip arthroplasty [J].
Austin, MS ;
Hozack, WJ ;
Sharkey, PF ;
Rothman, RH .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2003, 18 (03) :88-90
[3]  
Bal B S, 1996, Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), V25, P61
[4]  
Blackley H R, 2000, Instr Course Lect, V49, P3
[5]   Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty [J].
Bono, JV .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A :118-122
[6]  
Bose WJ, 2000, ORTHOPEDICS, V23, P433
[7]   Soft tissue balancing - The hip [J].
Bourne, RB ;
Rorabeck, CH .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2002, 17 (04) :17-22
[8]   Leg-length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty [J].
Clark, CR ;
Huddleston, HD ;
Schoch, EP ;
Thomas, BJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2006, 14 (01) :38-45
[9]   THE EFFECT OF IMPOSED LEG LENGTH DIFFERENCE ON PELVIC BONE SYMMETRY [J].
CUMMINGS, G ;
SCHOLZ, JP ;
BARNES, K .
SPINE, 1993, 18 (03) :368-373
[10]   The precision and usefulness of preoperative planning for cemented and hybrid primary total hip arthroplasty [J].
Della Valle, AG ;
Slullitel, G ;
Piccaluga, F ;
Salvati, EA .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2005, 20 (01) :51-58