Accuracy and reproducibility of automated estradiol-17β and progesterone assays using native serum samples:: results obtained in the Belgian external assessment scheme

被引:32
作者
Coucke, Wim [1 ]
Devleeschouwer, Nicole [1 ]
Libeer, Jean-Claude [1 ]
Schiettecatte, Johan [2 ]
Martin, Manou [3 ]
Smitz, Johan [2 ]
机构
[1] Sci Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Biol Clin, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[2] UZ Brussel, Lab Clin Chem & Radioimmunol, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Univ Antwerp Hosp, UZA Dept Hormonol Therapeut Drug Monitoring & Cli, B-2650 Edegem, Belgium
关键词
immunoassay; estradiol; progesterone; external quality assessment; automation;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/dem322
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: In 2005, a special survey in the Belgian External Quality Assessment focused on the performance of six automated immunoassay analysers most frequently used in Belgium for estradiol-17 beta (E-2 and progesterone. Results obtained were compared with values determined by reference method, isotope dilution-gas chromatograph/mass spectrometry (ID-GC/MS). METHODS: Five fresh frozen serum samples, without additives, from single donors and three pools from pregnant women were distributed to all registered Belgian laboratories. Total variation, bias, linear relationship within the reported range and linear regression were investigated. RESULTS: Inter-laboratory coefficients of variation ranged from 4 to 49% for E2 and from 6 to 45% for progesterone. Bias ranged from -26 to 239% for E2 and from -23 to 81% for progesterone. Several systems showed an upward bias for one particular sample of at least 25%. Weighted linear regression showed overall bias ranging from -8% to 32% for E2 and from 7% to 41% for progesterone. CONCLUSIONS: Few automated methods succeed in having an excellent reproducibility for E2 and progesterone. Given the high bias values it is suggested that, for performance testing, results be compared whenever possible with a reference method. The linear relationship as assessed by comparing results with those obtained by ID-GC/MS using samples from different donors was not assured for most methods.
引用
收藏
页码:3204 / 3209
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Clinical validation of a fully automated 17β-estradiol and progesterone assay (VIDAS®) for use in monitoring assisted reproduction treatment [J].
Anckaert, E ;
Mees, M ;
Schiettecatte, J ;
Smitz, J .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2002, 40 (08) :824-831
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Ned Tijdschr voor Klin Chemie
[3]   Multicentre performance evaluation of the E170 module for MODULAR ANALYTICS [J].
Bieglmayer, C ;
Chan, DW ;
Sokoll, L ;
Imdahl, R ;
Kobayashi, M ;
Yamada, E ;
Lilje, DJ ;
Luthe, H ;
Meissner, J ;
Messeri, G ;
Celli, A ;
Tozzi, P ;
Roth, HJ ;
Schmidt, FP ;
Mächler, ML ;
Schuff-Werner, P ;
Zingler, C ;
Smitz, J ;
Schiettecatte, J ;
Vonderschmitt, DJ ;
Pei, P ;
Ng, K ;
Ebert, C ;
Kirch, P ;
Wanger, M ;
McGovern, M ;
Stockmann, W ;
Kunst, A .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2004, 42 (10) :1186-1202
[4]   FALSELY ELEVATED STEROIDAL ASSAY LEVELS RELATED TO HETEROPHILE ANTIBODIES AGAINST VARIOUS ANIMAL SPECIES [J].
CHECK, JH ;
UBELACKER, L ;
LAUER, CC .
GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 1995, 40 (02) :139-140
[5]  
Efron B., 1993, INTRO BOOTSTRAP MONO, DOI DOI 10.1201/9780429246593
[6]  
Kricka LJ, 1999, CLIN CHEM, V45, P942
[7]  
LIBEER JC, 1994, OPEN ELECT DATA INTE, P51
[8]   Analytical performance of a new two-step ADVIA Centaur® estradiol immunoassay during ovarian stimulation [J].
Massart, C ;
Gibassier, J ;
Laurent, MC ;
Le Lannou, D .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2006, 44 (01) :105-109
[9]   Analytical and clinical performance of an automated immunoassay system (Immulite®) for estradiol in serum [J].
Rodríguez-Espinosa, J ;
Otal-Entraigas, C ;
Gascón-Roche, N ;
Mora-Brugués, J ;
Urgell-Rull, E ;
Bordás-Serrat, JR ;
Viscasillas-Molins, P .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 1998, 36 (12) :969-974
[10]  
Sen A, 1997, Regression analysis: theory, methods, and applications