The Dynamics of Sources of Knowledge on the Nature of Innovation in the Public Sector: Understanding Incremental and Transformative Innovations in Local Governments

被引:16
作者
Zambrano-Gutierrez, Julio C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Puppim de Oliveira, Jose A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fundacao Getulio Vargas FGV EAESP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] FGV EBAPE, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Munich, Germany
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; ORGANIZATIONAL ROUTINES; COLLABORATIVE INNOVATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; POLICY; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; NETWORKS; LESSONS; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1093/jopart/muab053
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Understanding the effects of different sources of knowledge acquisition in public organizations has become widely promoted for overcoming sociotechnical challenges through innovation. This study divided the sources of knowledge into external and internal learning mechanisms to assess their divergent effects on incremental and transformative innovations in 82 local governments involved in green and blue infrastructure projects. First, the study tests whether more diverse external sources of knowledge acquisition are more effective in increasing transformative innovation than internal learning mechanisms. The second proposition tests whether internal changes in organizational routines are associated with incremental rather than transformative innovation. Results from mediation analysis using structural equation models confirm that the initial negative effect of external and internal learning mechanisms on innovation can be eliminated, on the one hand, by engaging in more diverse cross-sector collaborations to increase transformative innovations and, on the other hand, by focusing on changing administrative routines to support incremental innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:656 / 670
页数:15
相关论文
共 107 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Innov J
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, International Public Management Review
[3]   Collaborative governance in theory and practice [J].
Ansell, Chris ;
Gash, Alison .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2008, 18 (04) :543-571
[4]  
Arundel A., 2011, INTEGRATED INNOVATIO
[5]   From too little to too much innovation? Issues in measuring innovation in the public sector [J].
Arundel, Anthony ;
Huber, Dorothea .
STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2013, 27 :146-159
[6]   Understanding collaboration outcomes from an extended resource-based view perspective: The roles of organizational characteristics, partner attributes, and network structures [J].
Arya, Bindu ;
Lin, Zhiang .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2007, 33 (05) :697-723
[7]  
Barbi F, 2019, EARTH SYST GOV CUP, P59
[8]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[9]  
Bell M., 1984, TECHNOLOGICAL CAPABI, P187, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-17487-4_10
[10]   Innovation capability building and learning mechanisms in latecomer firms: recent empirical contributions and implications for research [J].
Bell, Martin ;
Figueiredo, Paulo N. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-REVUE CANADIENNE D ETUDES DU DEVELOPPEMENT, 2012, 33 (01) :14-40