Optimality of square-root measurements in quantum state discrimination

被引:45
作者
Dalla Pozza, Nicola [1 ]
Pierobon, Gianfranco [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales Canberra, Sch Engn & Informat Technol, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[2] Univ Padua, Padua, Italy
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW A | 2015年 / 91卷 / 04期
关键词
PRETTY GOOD MEASUREMENT; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevA.91.042334
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Distinguishing assigned quantum states with assigned probabilities via quantum measurements is a crucial problem for the transmission of classical information through quantum channels. Measurement operators maximizing the probability of correct discrimination have been characterized by Helstrom, Holevo, and Yuen since the 1970s. On the other hand, closed-form solutions are available only for particular situations enjoying high degrees of symmetry. As a suboptimal solution to the problem, measurement operators, directly determined from states and probabilities and known as square-root measurements (SRMs), were introduced by Hausladen and Wootters. These operators were also recognized to be optimal for pure states equipped with geometrical uniform symmetry (GUS). In this paper we discuss the optimality of the SRM and find necessary and sufficient conditions in order that SRM maximize the correct decision probabilities for the set of states formed by several constellations of GUS states. The results are applied to some specific examples concerning double constellations of quantum phase-shift keying and pulse-position modulation states, with possible applications to practical systems of quantum communications.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[11]   Designing optimal quantum detectors via semidefinite programming [J].
Eldar, YC ;
Megretski, A ;
Verghese, GC .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 2003, 49 (04) :1007-1012
[12]   On quantum detection and the square-root measurement [J].
Eldar, YC ;
Forney, GD .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 2001, 47 (03) :858-872
[13]   Classical information capacity of a quantum channel [J].
Hausladen, P ;
Jozsa, R ;
Schumacher, B ;
Westmoreland, M ;
Wootters, WK .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1996, 54 (03) :1869-1876
[14]   A PRETTY GOOD MEASUREMENT FOR DISTINGUISHING QUANTUM STATES [J].
HAUSLADEN, P ;
WOOTTERS, WK .
JOURNAL OF MODERN OPTICS, 1994, 41 (12) :2385-2390
[15]  
Hayashi M, 2008, QUANTUM INF COMPUT, V8, P345
[16]  
Helstrom C.W., 1976, QUANTUM DETECTION ES
[17]   BAYES-COST REDUCTION ALGORITHM IN QUANTUM HYPOTHESIS-TESTING [J].
HELSTROM, CW .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 1982, 28 (02) :359-366
[18]  
Holevo A.S, 1973, J. Multivariate Anal., V3, P337, DOI [10.1016/0047-259X(73)90028-6, 10.1016/0047-259x(73)90028-6, DOI 10.1016/0047-259X(73)90028-6]
[19]   Quantum detection and mutual information for QAM and PSK signals [J].
Kato, K ;
Osaki, M ;
Sasaki, M ;
Hirota, O .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, 1999, 47 (02) :248-254
[20]  
Kato K, 2013, TAMAGAWA U QUANTUM I, V3, P29