Stump pressure and somatosensory evoked potentials for predicting the use of shunt during carotid surgery

被引:16
作者
Astarci, P. [1 ]
Guerit, J. M. [1 ]
Robert, A. [1 ]
Elkhoury, G. [1 ]
Noirhomme, P. [1 ]
Rubay, J. [1 ]
Lacroix, V. [1 ]
Poncelet, A. [1 ]
Funker, J. C. [1 ]
Glineur, D. [1 ]
Verhelst, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Luc Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.avsg.2006.07.009
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study is to compare measurement of stump pressure (SP) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) made during carotid surgery as criteria upon which to base the decision whether or not to use a shunt. We included 288 patients who underwent for carotid surgery under general anaesthesia. We performed 247 endarterectomies with patch closure (85.7%), 25 carotid transsection with reimplantation (8.7%), and 16 carotid bypasses (5.6%). SSEP monitoring showed no modi. cation in 225/288 patients (78.1%), moderate modification in 32/288 patients (11.1%), and severe modi. cation in 31/288 patients (10.8%). Shunt was used if there was moderate or severe SSEP modi. cation in response to carotid clamping, which represents 63 patients in our series. A shunt was used in 47/288 patients (16.3%). In 16 patients, despite SSEP modi. cations, the shunt was not used because these SSEP modi. cations occurred only in the last minutes of the procedure just before off clamping the carotid. The mean SP for all patients was 51 mm Hg. In the shunted patients, the mean SP was 33 mm Hg. Variation of SP was correlated with the SSEP modifications. There was just one perioperative stroke in this series (1/288 = 0.3%). We concluded that the threshold of SP below which shunting is indicated in our study was 44 mm Hg with 81% sensibility and 68% specificity.
引用
收藏
页码:312 / 317
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Prediction of cerebral ischemic tolerance during carotid cross-clamping by angiographic criteria
    Aleksic, M
    Gawenda, M
    Heckenkamp, J
    Matoussevitch, V
    Coburger, S
    Brunkwall, J
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 27 (06) : 640 - 645
  • [2] AMANTINI A, 1992, J NEUROL, V239, P241
  • [3] Stump pressure and transcranial Doppler for predicting shunting in carotid endarterectomy
    Belardi, P
    Lucertini, G
    Ermirio, D
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 25 (02) : 164 - 167
  • [4] BUCHE M, 1988, J CARDIOVASC SURG, V29, P428
  • [5] RESULTS OF ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHIC MONITORING DURING 367 CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMIES - USE OF A DEDICATED MINICOMPUTER
    CHIAPPA, KH
    BURKE, SR
    YOUNG, RR
    [J]. STROKE, 1979, 10 (04) : 381 - 388
  • [6] Transcranial Doppler in carotid endarterectomy
    Dunne, VG
    Besser, M
    Ma, WJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 8 (02) : 140 - 145
  • [7] INTRA-OPERATIVE MONITORING AND INTERNAL SHUNTS - ARE THEY NECESSARY IN CAROTID ENDERTERECTOMY
    FERGUSON, GG
    [J]. STROKE, 1982, 13 (03) : 287 - 289
  • [8] Electroencephalography (EEG) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) to prevent cerebral ischaemia in the operating room
    Florence, G
    Guerit, JM
    Gueguen, B
    [J]. NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE CLINIQUE-CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 34 (01): : 17 - 32
  • [9] GAUTIER PE, 1991, ANESTH ANALG, V73, P649
  • [10] MONITORING OF SUBCORTICAL AND CORTICAL SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED-POTENTIALS DURING CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY - COMPARISON WITH STUMP PRESSURE LEVELS
    GIGLI, GL
    CARAMIA, M
    MARCIANI, MG
    ZAROLA, F
    LAVARONI, F
    ROSSINI, PM
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1987, 68 (06): : 424 - 432