Multiscale interplay of higher-order moments between the carbon and energy markets during Phase III of the EU ETS

被引:72
作者
Dai, Xingyu [1 ]
Xiao, Ling [2 ]
Wang, Qunwei [1 ]
Dhesi, Gurjeet [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Econ & Management, 29 Jiangjun Ave, Nanjing 211106, Peoples R China
[2] Royal Holloway Univ London, Egham TW20 0EX, Surrey, England
[3] London South Bank Univ, London, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
EU ETS; Energy markets; Higher-order moments; Multiscale analysis; Portfolio management; EUROPEAN CARBON; OIL MARKET; PRICE DRIVERS; CO2; PRICES; VOLATILITY; SPILLOVERS; EMISSIONS; ELECTRICITY; DEPENDENCE; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112428
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The Phase III of the European Union Emission Trading System (EU ETS) is significantly different from the previous Phases in terms of price trajectory and operational mechanism. Against this background, this study reveals the multiscale interplay of higher-order moments (skewness and kurtosis) between the carbon and energy markets, and formulates optimal portfolio strategies to manage higher-order moments risks at different time horizons. We detect a breakpoint, September 15, 2016, in the carbon-energy markets which divides Phase III into two stages corresponding to different market status. Our findings show that the bidirectional higher-order moments spillovers between the carbon and energy markets are weak at the short-run timescales (below 16 trading days), while the long-run (over 16 trading days) higher-order spillover effect is greatly enhanced. In particular, we find the spillovers in the higher-order moments are strong when the carbon and energy markets are in bullish status. Furthermore, we demonstrate that carbon assets are good short-run hedge against exposure to spillover risks in higher-order moments of the energy markets, while the hedging effectiveness declines at the long-run timescales.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Price determination in the EU ETS market: Theory and econometric analysis with market fundamentals [J].
Aatola, Piia ;
Ollikainen, Markku ;
Toppinen, Anne .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2013, 36 :380-395
[2]   Price drivers and structural breaks in European carbon prices 2005-2007 [J].
Alberola, Emilie ;
Chevallier, Julien ;
Cheze, Benoit .
ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (02) :787-797
[3]   Coal phase-outs and carbon prices: Interactions between EU emission trading and national carbon mitigation policies [J].
Anke, Carl-Philipp ;
Hobbie, Hannes ;
Schreiber, Steffi ;
Moest, Dominik .
ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 144
[4]   Risk spillovers across the energy and carbon markets and hedging strategies for carbon risk [J].
Balcilar, Mehmet ;
Demirer, Riza ;
Hammoudeh, Shawkat ;
Duc Khuong Nguyen .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 54 :159-172
[5]   The role of autoregressive conditional skewness and kurtosis in the estimation of conditional VaR [J].
Bali, Turan G. ;
Mo, Hengyong ;
Tang, Yi .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2008, 32 (02) :269-282
[6]   Measuring the Frequency Dynamics of Financial Connectedness and Systemic Risk [J].
Barunik, Jozef ;
Krehlik, Tomas .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMETRICS, 2018, 16 (02) :271-296
[7]   The reformed EU ETS - Intertemporal emission trading with restricted banking [J].
Bocklet, Johanna ;
Hintermayer, Martin ;
Schmidt, Lukas ;
Wildgrube, Theresa .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 84
[8]   Moments-based spillovers across gold and oil markets [J].
Bonato, Matteo ;
Gupta, Rangan ;
Lau, Chi Keung Marco ;
Wang, Shixuan .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 89
[9]  
Brooks C., 2005, J FINANCIAL ECONOMET, V3, P399, DOI DOI 10.1093/JJFINEC/NBI018
[10]   The long-term impact of the market stability reserve on the EU emission trading system [J].
Bruninx, Kenneth ;
Ovaere, Marten ;
Delarue, Erik .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 89