High-Quality Colonoscopy: A Review of Quality Indicators and Best Practices

被引:5
作者
Soeder, Mason [1 ]
Turshudzhyan, Alla [2 ]
Rosenberg, Lisa [3 ]
Tadros, Micheal [4 ]
机构
[1] Albany Med Coll, Albany, NY 12208 USA
[2] Univ Connecticut, Dept Internal Med, Farmington, CT 06030 USA
[3] Albany Med Coll, Dept Internal Med, Albany, NY 12208 USA
[4] Albany Med Coll, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Albany, NY 12208 USA
关键词
colorectal cancer; CRC; screening; high-quality colonoscopy; prevention; ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION; BOWEL PREPARATION; COLORECTAL-CANCER; POLYPS; TRIAL; NEOPLASIA; STIFFNESS; ADENOMAS; EMR;
D O I
10.3390/gastroent13020017
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Colorectal cancer (CRC) continues to be the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the US. Colonoscopy remains the best preventative tool against the development of CRC. As a result, high-quality colonoscopy is becoming increasingly important. Specifically, recent guidelines have highlighted pre-procedural, peri-procedural, and post-procedural practices, which promise to improve patient outcomes and reduce the mortality and interval cancer rates in patients undergoing colonoscopies. Despite the guidelines and advances in modern endoscopy, the procedure remains provider-dependent, which results in differences in outcomes. As a result, incorporating high-quality colonoscopy approaches early in training is key to improving patient outcomes. Additionally, ensuring that high-quality colonoscopy is practiced widely by endoscopists can lead to the most cost-effective care.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 172
页数:11
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Alvarez-Gonzalez MA, 2019, DIS COLON RECTUM, V62, P491, DOI [10.1097/DCR.0000000000001305, 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001305]
[2]   A survey on colonoscopy shows poor understanding of its protective value and widespread misconceptions across Europe [J].
Amlani, Bharat ;
Radaelli, Franco ;
Bhandari, Pradeep .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (05)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2022, WHAT SHOULD KNOW SCR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2021, COST EFFECTIVENESS C
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, EUROPEAN GUIDELINES
[6]   Impact of patient audiovisual re-education via a smartphone on the quality of bowel preparation before colonoscopy: a single-blinded randomized study [J].
Back, Su Young ;
Kim, Hyun Gun ;
Ahn, Eu Mi ;
Park, Suyeon ;
Jeon, Seong Ran ;
Im, Hee Hyuk ;
Kim, Jin-Oh ;
Ko, Bong Min ;
Lee, Joon Seong ;
Lee, Tae Hee ;
Cho, Jun-Hyung .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (03) :789-+
[7]   Analysis of Administrative Data Finds Endoscopist Quality Measures Associated With Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer [J].
Baxter, Nancy N. ;
Sutradhar, Rinku ;
Forbes, Shawn S. ;
Paszat, Lawrence F. ;
Saskin, Refik ;
Rabeneck, Linda .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 140 (01) :65-72
[8]   Should the Endoscopic Restrictions during COVID-19 Pandemic Remain Unchanged? [J].
Bresky, Emilio ;
Bresky, Gustavo ;
Lancellotti, Domingo ;
Madariaga, Juan ;
Licuime, Sebastian ;
Palma, Paulette ;
Saez, Fabian ;
Jose Rojas, Maria ;
Seijas, Luis .
GASTROENTEROLOGY INSIGHTS, 2021, 12 (03) :358-365
[9]   Comprehensive validation of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale [J].
Calderwood, Audrey H. ;
Jacobson, Brian C. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 72 (04) :686-692
[10]   Maximizing the general success of cecal intubation during propofol sedation in a multi-endoscopist academic centre [J].
Cardin, Fabrizio ;
Minicuci, Nadia ;
Andreotti, Alessandra ;
Pinetti, Elena ;
Campigotto, Federico ;
Dona, Barbara M. ;
Martella, Bruno ;
Terranova, Oreste .
BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 10