Research Priorities in Family Caregiving: Process and Outcomes of a Conference on Family-Centered Care Across the Trajectory of Serious Illness

被引:41
作者
Harvath, Theresa A. [1 ]
Mongoven, Jennifer M. [1 ]
Bidwell, Julie T. [1 ]
Cothran, Fawn A. [1 ]
Sexson, Kathryn E. [1 ]
Mason, Diana J. [2 ]
Buckwalter, Kathleen [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Betty Irene Moore Sch Nursing, Betty Irene Moore Hall,Suite 2400,2570 48th St, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[2] George Washington Univ, Sch Nursing, Washington, DC USA
[3] Univ Oklahoma, Hlth Sci Ctr, Coll Nursing, Reynolds Ctr, Oklahoma City, OK USA
关键词
Caregiving-informal; Consensus; Diversity and ethnicity; Heterogeneity; Technology; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1093/geront/gnz138
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学]; R592 [老年病学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100203 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The number of older adults living with functional decline and serious illness is growing exponentially at a time when availability of both family and professional caregivers is strained. Achieving optimal outcomes for this vulnerable population involves advancing the knowledge needed to improve the quality of care delivered by families, health professionals, and community programs. Recent reports from National Institute of Health and the National Academy of Science, Engineering and Medicine have called for the identification of gaps in key areas of family caregiving intervention research. In March 2018, the Family Caregiving Institute at UC Davis convened an invitational meeting of over 50 thought leaders in family caregiving-representing service agencies, funding organizations, and academia-to participate in the Research Priorities in Caregiving Summit: Advancing Family-Centered Care across the Trajectory of Serious Illness. Using an iterative process, attendees identified the top 10 research priorities and created research priority statements that incorporated a definition of the priority topic, rationale for the priority; problem(s) to address; priority population(s); and example research topics. The research priority statements serve as a roadmap for research development that will address the most significant gaps in the caregiving field.
引用
收藏
页码:S5 / S13
页数:9
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Apesoa-Varano EC, 2015, GENERATIONS, V39, P39
[2]   The Impact of Informal Caregiving for Older Adults on the Health of Various Types of Caregivers: A Systematic Review [J].
Bom, Judith ;
Bakx, Pieter ;
Schut, Frederik ;
van Doorslaer, Eddy .
GERONTOLOGIST, 2019, 59 (05) :E629-E642
[3]   Report on milestones for care and support under the US National Plan to Address Alzheimer's Disease [J].
Borson, Soo ;
Boustani, Malaz A. ;
Buckwalter, Kathleen C. ;
Burgio, Louis D. ;
Chodosh, Joshua ;
Fortinsky, Richard H. ;
Gifford, David R. ;
Gwyther, Lisa P. ;
Koren, Mary Jane ;
Lynn, Joanne ;
Phillips, Cheryl ;
Roherty, Martha ;
Ronch, Judah ;
Stahl, Claudia ;
Rodgers, Lauren ;
Kim, Hye ;
Baumgart, Matthew ;
Geiger, Angela .
ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA, 2016, 12 (03) :334-369
[4]  
Brown J., 2005, The world cafe: Shaping our futures through conversations that matter
[5]  
Gallagher-Thompson D., 2020, CARE GIVING TR UNPUB
[6]  
Gitlin L.N., 2018, REPORT NATL ADVISORY
[7]   Patient and public engagement in health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes research: what is important and why should we care? Findings from the first ISOQOL patient engagement symposium [J].
Haywood, Kirstie ;
Brett, Jo ;
Salek, Sam ;
Marlett, Nancy ;
Penman, Colin ;
Shklarov, Svetlana ;
Norris, Colleen ;
Santana, Maria Jose ;
Staniszewska, Sophie .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (05) :1069-1076
[8]  
Lindeman D. A., 2020, TECHNOLOGY CAR UNPUB
[9]  
National Institute for Nursing Research, 2017, SCI CAR BRING VOIC T
[10]   Technology and Aging: An Evolving Partnership [J].
Pruchno, Rachel .
GERONTOLOGIST, 2019, 59 (01) :1-5