Private practice dentists' views of oral health injustice

被引:1
作者
Holden, Alexander C. L. [1 ,2 ]
Adam, Lee [3 ]
Thomson, Murray [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Discipline Populat Oral Hlth, Sch Dent, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Sydney Dent Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Otago, Fac Dent, Dept Oral Sci, Dunedin, New Zealand
关键词
Access to care; Dentistry; Professionalism; Commercialism; Injustice; Qualitative research; TOOTH LOSS; IMPACT; NEOLIBERALISM; STIGMA; TEETH; LIFE;
D O I
10.1922/CDH_00009Holden07
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: There is a lack of research examining how dentists in private practice conceptualise the challenge presented by oral health injustice and how attitudes towards low-income patients might be influenced by the commercial nature of private dental care. This study provides insights into how dentists navigated the interactions between the commercial nature of dental practice and the provision of care to patients who either struggled to (or could not) afford the cost of self-funded care in private practice. Methods: Participants took part in semi-structured interviews and were invited to keep an online diary of reflections. Thematic analysis was used to examine the data to extract and synthesise understanding of how practitioners conceptualised issues surrounding providing care for the disadvantaged and how this related to the economic realities of private practice. Results: Twenty participants were recruited and interviewed from a variety of private practice environments and roles. This report focuses on one specific theme within the data that explored how participants viewed patients who received public dental care, as well as those privately funded patients who could ill-afford their treatment. Conclusions: The findings raise how neoliberal attitudes towards oral healthcare and dental disease may act as a social determinant of health and contribute to the sustaining of structural barriers and inaction towards oral health injustice. For low-income patients, practitioners distinguish between (a) those who are deemed to be deserving of professional care and the charitable endeavours of the profession, and (b) those who are not. There appears to be no overt professional obligation to actively work towards the amelioration of oral health injustice.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 274
页数:7
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Participation: the ascendancy of a buzzword in the neo- liberal era [J].
Alejandro Leal, Pablo .
DEVELOPMENT IN PRACTICE, 2007, 17 (4-5) :539-548
[2]  
American Dental Association, MED WHY WE NEED STRE
[3]  
American Dental Association, 2018, PRINC ETH COD PROF
[4]  
Anfara J., 2008, The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods, V2, P930
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1998, QUALITATIVE ACTION R
[6]  
[Anonymous], The Body and Social Theory
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Filling the Gap: A Universal Dental Scheme for Australia
[8]   Is the dental profession ready for person-centred care? [J].
Apelian, Nareg ;
Vergnes, Jean-Noel ;
Bedos, Christophe .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2020, 229 (02) :133-137
[9]  
Australian Government Productivity Commission, 2019, REP GOV SERV 2018
[10]   Shorter lives in stingier states: Social policy shortcomings help explain the US mortality disadvantage [J].
Beckfield, Jason ;
Bambra, Clare .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2016, 171 :30-38