Estimating the Size and Impact of the Ecological Restoration Economy

被引:115
作者
BenDor, Todd [1 ]
Lester, T. William [1 ]
Livengood, Avery [1 ]
Davis, Adam [2 ]
Yonavjak, Logan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept City & Reg Planning, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 USA
[2] Ecosyst Investment Partners, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Forestry, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
INFRASTRUCTURE; HABITAT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0128339
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Domestic public debate continues over the economic impacts of environmental regulations that require environmental restoration. This debate has occurred in the absence of broadscale empirical research on economic output and employment resulting from environmental restoration, restoration-related conservation, and mitigation actions-the activities that are part of what we term the "restoration economy." In this article, we provide a high-level accounting of the size and scope of the restoration economy in terms of employment, value added, and overall economic output on a national scale. We conducted a national survey of businesses that participate in restoration work in order to estimate the total sales and number of jobs directly associated with the restoration economy, and to provide a profile of this nascent sector in terms of type of restoration work, industrial classification, workforce needs, and growth potential. We use survey results as inputs into a national input-output model (IMPLAN 3.1) in order to estimate the indirect and induced economic impacts of restoration activities. Based on this analysis we conclude that the domestic ecological restoration sector directly employs similar to 126,000 workers and generates similar to $9.5 billion in economic output (sales) annually. This activity supports an additional 95,000 jobs and $15 billion in economic output through indirect (business-to-business) linkages and increased household spending.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], HDB ECOLOGICAL RESTO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, EC HUM WELLB BIOD SY
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, FED REG
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, INTERNET MAIL MIXED
[5]  
Associates Southwick, 2013, CONS EC AM DIR INV E
[6]   Habitat preservation and restoration: Do homebuyers have preferences for quality habitat? [J].
Bark, R. H. ;
Osgood, D. E. ;
Colby, B. G. ;
Katz, G. ;
Stromberg, J. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (05) :1465-1475
[7]   Defining and evaluating the ecological restoration economy [J].
BenDor, Todd K. ;
Livengood, Avery ;
Lester, T. William ;
Davis, Adam ;
Yonavjak, Logan .
RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2015, 23 (03) :209-219
[8]   A survey of entrepreneurial risk in U.S. wetland and stream compensatory mitigation markets [J].
BenDor, Todd K. ;
Riggsbee, J. Adam .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2011, 14 (03) :301-314
[9]  
Bennett G, CHARTING NEW WATERS
[10]  
Bennett G., 2014, Gaining depth: state of watershed investment 2014