The influence of values in shared (medical) decision making

被引:0
作者
Baldt, Bettina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Dept Systemat Theol, Ethics, Schenkenstrasse 8-10, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
Medical decision making; Shared decision making; Values; Patient autonomy; PATIENT AUTONOMY; THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE; MODEL; LIMITS; CARE;
D O I
10.1007/s00481-019-00549-y
中图分类号
R-052 [医学伦理学];
学科分类号
0101 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Definition of the problem The Shared Decision Making model is becoming increasingly popular also in the German-speaking context, but it only considers values of patients to be relevant for medical decisions. Nevertheless, studies show that the values of physicians are also influential in medical decisions. Moreover, physicians are often unaware of this influence, which makes it impossible to control it. Arguments The influence of both patients' and physicians' values is examined from an empirical and normative perspective. The review about the empirical data provides a necessary overview about the status quo, whereas I deduct rules for value-influenced behaviour in the decision making process in the normative approach. Therefore, different scenarios are taken into account to explore in which situations it is acceptable for physicians to let their values be part of the decision making process. The conscious use of values is only possible, when physicians are aware of their influence. To raise awareness, the best option would be to educate future physicians about it in their training. Therefore, this article provides a teaching concept for a unit that could be part of an ethics class for physicians in training. Furthermore, patient's rights and responsibilities in the decision making process are discussed. Conclusion I conclude that it is necessary to take the influence of values (more) into account and include this knowledge into the training of physicians. Conclusively, recommendations for patients and physicians and their dealing with values in shared decision making processes are suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 47
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Why values elicitation techniques enable people to make informed decisions about cancer trial participation [J].
Abhyankar, Purva ;
Bekker, Hilary L. ;
Summers, Barbara A. ;
Velikova, Galina .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2011, 14 :20-32
[2]  
[Anonymous], NAT COMP BAS LEARN O
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, INDIKATION THEORETIS
[4]  
[Anonymous], CURR STUD HUM MED N2
[5]  
[Anonymous], SELF STUD MED
[6]   What do patient values and preferences mean? A taxonomy based on a systematic review of qualitative papers [J].
Bastemeijer, Carla M. ;
Voogt, Lennard ;
van Ewijk, Johannes P. ;
Hazelzet, Jan A. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2017, 100 (05) :871-881
[7]  
Beauchamp TL, 2019, Principles of biomedical ethics, V8th
[8]  
Birnbacher D., 2012, MedR, V30, P560
[9]   Patient-centredness from education to practice: The 'lived' impact of communication skills training [J].
Bombeke, Katrien ;
Symons, Linda ;
Vermeire, Etienne ;
Debaene, Luc ;
Schol, Sandrina ;
De Winter, Benedicte ;
Van Royen, Paul .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2012, 34 (05) :E338-E348
[10]   Training health professionals in shared decision making: Update of an international environmental scan [J].
Diouf, Ndeye Thiab ;
Menear, Matthew ;
Robitaille, Hubert ;
Guerard, Genevieve Painchaud ;
Legare, France .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2016, 99 (11) :1753-1758