The DTT device: Rationale for the choice of the parameters

被引：15

作者：

Crisanti, F. ^{[1
]}

Albanese, R. ^{[2
]}

Ambrosino, R. ^{[2
]}

Calabro, G. ^{[1
]}

Duval, B. ^{[3
]}

Giruzzi, G. ^{[4
]}

Granucci, G. ^{[5
]}

Maddaluno, G. ^{[1
]}

Ramogida, G. ^{[1
]}

Reimerdes, H. ^{[3
]}

Zagorski, R. ^{[6
]}

机构：

[1] ENEA Frascati, Via E Fermi 45, I-00044 Frascati, Italy

[2] Univ Napoli Federico II, ENEA CREATE, Via Claudio 21, I-80125 Naples, Italy

[3] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, CRPP, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

[4] CEA, IRFM, F-13108 St Paul Les Durance, France

[5] ENEA CNR Assoc, Ist Fis Plasma, Milan, Italy

[6] IPPLM Assoc, Inst Plasma Phys & Laser Microfus, Warsaw, Poland

来源：

FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN | 2017年 / 122卷

基金：

欧盟地平线“2020”;

关键词：

Power exhaust; Reactor relevant; Edge bulk integration; SIMILARITY; DESIGN;

D O I：

10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.05.053

中图分类号：

TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];

学科分类号：

0827 ; 082701 ;

摘要：

The main goal of the Divertor Tokamak Test facility (DTT) is to explore alternative power exhaust solutions for the next step after ITER, i.e., a demonstration power plant DEMO that will explore steady-state operation.The principal objective of DTT is to mitigate the risk of a difficult extrapolation to fusion reactor of the conventional divertor based on detached conditions under test on ITER. The task includes several issues, but with the main target to study the completely integrated (physics-technology and bulk-edge) power exhaust problems and to demonstrate how the possible implemented solutions (e.g., advanced divertor configurations or liquid metals) can be integrated in a DEMO device. This paper shows how the parameters for the design of a "flexible" facility, capable to perform this difficult task, can be worked out within the constraint of a fixed budget. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V.

引用

页码：288 / 298

页数：11

共 41 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 2007, DES CONSTR RUL MECH

[2]

[Anonymous], 2012, ROADM REAL FUS EN

[3]

[Anonymous], ITERD25EW4 K

[4]

Artaud J. F., 2005, 32 EPS C CONTR FUS P, V29C, pP1035

[5]

Barabaschi P., 1993, PLASM CONT TECHN M N

[6] Progress in the engineering design and assessment of the European DEMO first wall and divertor plasma facing components [J].

Barrett, Thomas R. ;

Ellwood, G. ;

Perez, G. ;

Kovari, M. ;

Fursdon, M. ;

Domptail, F. ;

Kirk, S. ;

McIntosh, S. C. ;

Roberts, S. ;

Zheng, S. ;

Boccaccini, L. V. ;

You, J. -H. ;

Bachmann, C. ;

Reiser, J. ;

Rieth, M. ;

Visca, E. ;

Mazzone, G. ;

Arbeiter, F. ;

Domalapally, P. K. .

FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2016, 109 :917-924

[7] Effect of three-dimensional conducting structures on vertical stability in EAST [J].

Chen, S. L. ;

Villone, F. ;

Barbato, L. ;

Mastrostefano, S. ;

Xiao, B. J. ;

Luo, Z. P. .

NUCLEAR FUSION, 2015, 55 (01)

[8]

Coenen J. W., 2016, PHYS SCR TT, VTT67

[9]

Colubchikov L.C., 1996, J NUCL MATER, V233-237, P667

[10]

Crisanti F., NUCL FUSION UNPUB

← 1 2 3 4 5 →