Intranasal fentanyl is an equivalent analgesic to oral morphine in paediatric burns patients for dressing changes: A randomised double blind crossover study

被引:79
作者
Borland, ML [1 ]
Bergesio, R [1 ]
Pascoe, EM [1 ]
Turner, S [1 ]
Woodger, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Princess Margaret Hosp Children, Dept Emergency, Perth, WA 6840, Australia
关键词
intranasal fentanyl; oral morphine; pediatric burns; burns dressings;
D O I
10.1016/j.burns.2005.05.001
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: The ideal analgesic agent for burns wound dressings in paediatric patients would be one that is easy to administer, well tolerated, and produces rapid onset of analgesia with a short duration of action and minimal side-effects to allow rapid resumption of activities and oral intake. We compared our current treatment of oral morphine to intranasal fentanyl in an attempt to find an agent closer to the ideal. Methods: A randomised double blind two-treatment crossover study comparing intranasal administration of fentanyl (INF) to orally administered morphine (OM). Children with burn injury aged up to 15 years and weighing 10-75 kg were included. Primary end-point was pain scores. Secondary end-points were time to resumption of age-appropriate activities, time to resumption of fluid intake, sedation and cooperation. Routine observations and vital signs were also recorded. Results: Twenty-four patients were studied with a median age of 4.5 years (interquartile range 1.8-9.0 years) and a median weight of 18.4 kg (interquartile range 12.9-33.2 kg). Mean pain difference scores (OM-INF) ranged from -0.500 (95% CI = -1.653 to 0.653) at baseline to -0.625 (05% CI = -1.863 to 0.613) for a retrospective rating of worst pain experienced during the dressing procedure. All measurements were within a pre-defined range of equivalent efficacy. The median time to resumption of fluid intake was 108 min (range 44-175 min) with OM and 140 min (range 60-210 min) with INF. These differences were not statistically significant. Fewer patients experienced mild side-effects with INF compared to OM (n = 5 versus n = 10). No patients experienced depressed respirations or oxygen saturations. Summary: Intranasal fentanyl was shown to be equivalent to oral morphine in the provision of analgesia for burn wound dressing changes in this cohort of paediatric patients. It was concluded that intranasal fentanyl is a suitable analgesic agent for use in paediatric burns dressing changes either by itself or in combination with oral morphine as a top up titratable agent. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:831 / 837
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Emerg Med
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, **DROPPED REF**
[3]  
Borland Meredith L, 2002, Emerg Med (Fremantle), V14, P275, DOI 10.1046/j.1442-2026.2002.00344.x
[4]   A randomised crossover trial of patient controlled intranasal fentanyl and oral morphine for procedural wound care in adult patients with burns [J].
Finn, J ;
Wright, J ;
Fong, J ;
Mackenzie, E ;
Wood, F ;
Leslie, G ;
Gelavis, A .
BURNS, 2004, 30 (03) :262-268
[5]   A study of the bispectral index monitor during procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department [J].
Gill, M ;
Green, SM ;
Krauss, B .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2003, 41 (02) :234-241
[6]   Multicentre randomised controlled trial of nasal diamorphine for analgesia in children and teenagers with clinical fractures [J].
Kendall, JM ;
Reeves, BC ;
Latter, VS .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7281) :261-265
[7]  
Lim Stephen C. B., 2003, Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, V33, P59
[8]   Preliminary clinical use of a patient-controlled intranasal analgesia (PCINA) device [J].
ONeil, G ;
Paech, M ;
Wood, F .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1997, 25 (04) :408-412
[9]  
Powell CV, 2001, ANN EMERG MED, V37, P28
[10]   A double-blind study of the analgesic efficacy of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate and oral morphine in pediatric patients undergoing burn dressing change and tubbing [J].
Robert, R ;
Brack, A ;
Blakeney, P ;
Villarreal, C ;
Rosenberg, L ;
Thomas, C ;
Meyer, WJ .
JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & REHABILITATION, 2003, 24 (06) :351-355