Effect of soil ageing on in vivo arsenic bioavailability in two dissimilar soils

被引:62
|
作者
Juhasz, Albert L. [1 ]
Smith, Euan [1 ]
Weber, John [1 ]
Naidu, Ravi [1 ]
Rees, Matthew [2 ]
Rofe, Allan [2 ]
Kuchel, Tim [2 ]
Sansom, Lloyd [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Australia, Ctr Environm Risk Assessment & Remediat, Div Informat Technol Engn & Environm, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
[2] Inst Med & Vet Sci, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[3] Univ S Australia, Sansom Inst, Sch Pharm & Med Sci, Div Hlth Sci, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
arsenic; bioaccessibility; bioavailability; soil ageing; sequential fractionation;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.12.022
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Arsenic (As) bioavailability in spiked soils aged for up to 12 months was assessed using in vitro and in vivo methodologies. Ageing (natural attenuation) of spiked soils resulted in a decline in in vivo As bioavailability (swine assay) of over 75% in soil A (Red Ferrosol) but had no significant effect on in vivo As bioavailability even after 12 months of ageing in soil B (Brown Chromosol). Sequential fractionation, however, indicated that there was repartitioning of As within the soil fractions extracted during the time course investigated. In soil A, the As fraction associated with the more weakly bound soil fractions decreased while the residual fraction increased from 12% to 35%. In contrast, little repartitioning of As was observed in soil B indicating that natural attenuation may be only applicable for As in soils containing specific mineralogical properties. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2180 / 2186
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of different soil washing solutions on bioavailability of residual arsenic in soils and soil properties
    Im, Jinwoo
    Yang, Kyung
    Jho, Eun Hea
    Nam, Kyoungphile
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2015, 138 : 253 - 258
  • [2] The influence of different antimony (Sb) compounds and ageing on bioavailability and fractionation of antimony in two dissimilar soils
    Bagherifam, Saeed
    Brown, Trevor C.
    Wijayawardena, Ayanka
    Naidu, Ravi
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2021, 270
  • [3] Comparison of in vivo and in vitro methodologies for the assessment of arsenic bioavailability in contaminated soils
    Juhasz, Albert L.
    Smith, Euan
    Weber, John
    Rees, Matthew
    Rofe, Allan
    Kuchel, Tim
    Sansom, Lloyd
    Naidu, Ravi
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2007, 69 (06) : 961 - 966
  • [4] Relative Bioavailability and Bioaccessibility and Speciation of Arsenic in Contaminated Soils
    Bradham, Karen D.
    Scheckel, Kirk G.
    Nelson, Clay M.
    Seales, Paul E.
    Lee, Grace E.
    Hughes, Michael F.
    Miller, Bradley W.
    Yeow, Aaron
    Gilmore, Thomas
    Serda, Sophia M.
    Harper, Sharon
    Thomas, David J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2011, 119 (11) : 1629 - 1634
  • [5] Decreasing arsenic bioaccessibility/bioavailability in soils with iron amendments
    Subacz, Jonathan L.
    Barnett, Mark O.
    Jardine, Philip M.
    Stewart, Melanie A.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 42 (09): : 1317 - 1329
  • [6] Effect of Nanoscale Zero-Valent Iron on Arsenic Bioaccessibility and Bioavailability in Soil
    Chen, Shuo
    Han, Lei
    Wang, Qiu
    Liu, Chenglang
    Liu, Yuzhen
    Li, Jie
    FRONTIERS IN CHEMISTRY, 2022, 10
  • [7] Analysis of arsenic bioavailability in contaminated soils
    Turpeinen, R
    Virta, M
    Häggblom, MM
    ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2003, 22 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [8] Bioavailability of arsenic in agricultural soils under the influence of different soil properties
    Suman B. Singh
    Pankaj Kumar Srivastava
    SN Applied Sciences, 2020, 2
  • [9] Bioavailability of arsenic in agricultural soils under the influence of different soil properties
    Singh, Suman B.
    Srivastava, Pankaj Kumar
    SN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2020, 2 (02):
  • [10] Effect of Al compounds on soil pH and bioavailability of Al in two acid soils
    Iqbal, Md Toufiq
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY, 2012, 36 (06) : 720 - 728