Benchmarking of different molecular docking methods for protein-peptide docking

被引:115
作者
Agrawal, Piyush [1 ,2 ]
Singh, Harinder [2 ]
Srivastava, Hemant Kumar [2 ]
Singh, Sandeep [2 ]
Kishore, Gaurav [2 ]
Raghava, Gajendra P. S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Indraprastha Inst Informat Technol, Ctr Computat Biol, Okhla Phase 3, New Delhi 110020, India
[2] CSIR Inst Microbial Technol, Sect 39A, Chandigarh, India
关键词
Protein-peptide docking; Benchmark; CAPRI; ZDOCK; FRODOCK; Hex; ATTRACT; PatchDock; pepATTRACT; WEB SERVER; BINDING-SITES; LIGAND DOCKING; PREDICTION; BLIND; ZDOCK; ALGORITHM; TOOL; OPTIMIZATION; REFINEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12859-018-2449-y
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
BackgroundMolecular docking studies on protein-peptide interactions are a challenging and time-consuming task because peptides are generally more flexible than proteins and tend to adopt numerous conformations. There are several benchmarking studies on protein-protein, protein-ligand and nucleic acid-ligand docking interactions. However, a series of docking methods is not rigorously validated for protein-peptide complexes in the literature. Considering the importance and wide application of peptide docking, we describe benchmarking of 6 docking methods on 133 protein-peptide complexes having peptide length between 9 to 15 residues. The performance of docking methods was evaluated using CAPRI parameters like FNAT, I-RMSD, L-RMSD.ResultFirstly, we performed blind docking and evaluate the performance of the top docking pose of each method. It was observed that FRODOCK performed better than other methods with average L-RMSD of 12.46 angstrom. The performance of all methods improved significantly for their best docking pose and achieved highest average L-RMSD of 3.72 angstrom in case of FRODOCK. Similarly, we performed re-docking and evaluated the performance of the top and best docking pose of each method. We achieved the best performance in case of ZDOCK with average L-RMSD 8.60 angstrom and 2.88 angstrom for the top and best docking pose respectively. Methods were also evaluated on 40 protein-peptide complexes used in the previous benchmarking study, where peptide have length up to 5 residues. In case of best docking pose, we achieved the highest average L-RMSD of 4.45 angstrom and 2.09 angstrom for the blind docking using FRODOCK and re-docking using AutoDock Vina respectively.ConclusionThe study shows that FRODOCK performed best in case of blind docking and ZDOCK in case of re-docking. There is a need to improve the ranking of docking pose generated by different methods, as the present ranking scheme is not satisfactory. To facilitate the scientific community for calculating CAPRI parameters between native and docked complexes, we developed a web-based service named PPDbench (http://webs.iiitd.edu.in/raghava/ppdbench/).
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]   In Silico Approach for Prediction of Antifungal Peptides [J].
Agrawal, Piyush ;
Bhalla, Sherry ;
Chaudhary, Kumardeep ;
Kumar, Rajesh ;
Sharma, Meenu ;
Raghava, Gajendra P. S. .
FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 9
[2]   CPPsite 2.0: a repository of experimentally validated cell-penetrating peptides [J].
Agrawal, Piyush ;
Bhalla, Sherry ;
Usmani, Salman Sadullah ;
Singh, Sandeep ;
Chaudhary, Kumardeep ;
Raghava, Gajendra P. S. ;
Gautam, Ankur .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2016, 44 (D1) :D1098-D1103
[3]   Modeling of protein-peptide interactions using the CABS-dock web server for binding site search and flexible docking [J].
Blaszczyk, Maciej ;
Kurcinski, Mateusz ;
Kouza, Maksim ;
Wieteska, Lukasz ;
Debinski, Aleksander ;
Kolinski, Andrzej ;
Kmiecik, Sebastian .
METHODS, 2016, 93 :72-83
[4]   FDA approved drugs complexed to their targets: evaluating pose prediction accuracy of docking protocols [J].
Bohari, Mohammed H. ;
Sastry, G. Narahari .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MODELING, 2012, 18 (09) :4263-4274
[5]   Identification of ATP binding residues of a protein from its primary sequence [J].
Chauhan, Jagat S. ;
Mishra, Nitish K. ;
Raghava, Gajendra P. S. .
BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2009, 10 :434
[6]   ZDOCK: An initial-stage protein-docking algorithm [J].
Chen, R ;
Li, L ;
Weng, ZP .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2003, 52 (01) :80-87
[7]   ClusPro: a fully automated algorithm for protein-protein docking [J].
Comeau, SR ;
Gatchell, DW ;
Vajda, S ;
Camacho, CJ .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2004, 32 :W96-W99
[8]   Improved FlexX docking using FlexS-determined base fragment placement [J].
Cross, SSJ .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2005, 45 (04) :993-1001
[9]   Membrane-Fusogen Distance Is Critical for Efficient Coiled-Coil-Peptide-Mediated Liposome Fusion [J].
Daudey, Geert A. ;
Zope, Harshal R. ;
Voskuhl, Jens ;
Kros, Alexander ;
Boyle, Aimee L. .
LANGMUIR, 2017, 33 (43) :12443-12452
[10]   The pepATTRACT web server for blind, large-scale peptide-protein docking [J].
de Vries, Sjoerd J. ;
Rey, Julien ;
Schindler, Christina E. M. ;
Zacharias, Martin ;
Tuffery, Pierre .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2017, 45 (W1) :W361-W364