Addressing Complexity in Environmental Management and Governance

被引:28
作者
Kirschke, Sabrina [1 ]
Newig, Jens [1 ]
机构
[1] Leuphana Univ Luneburg, Fac Sustainabil, Scharnhorststr 1, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany
关键词
complex problems; complex problem solving; governance; Integrated Water Resources Management; Water Framework Directive; wicked problems; WICKED PROBLEMS; STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION; DECISION-MAKING; PUBLIC-POLICY; WATER; CHALLENGES; SCIENCE; METAANALYSIS; COMMUNITIES; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.3390/su9060983
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Governance for complex problem solving has been increasingly discussed in environmental sustainability research. Above all, researchers continuously observe that sustainability problems are complex or "wicked", and suggest participatory models to address these problems in practice. In order to add to this debate, this study suggests a more differentiated theoretical approach to define governance for complex environmental problem solving than in previous studies. The approach consists of two vital steps: First, we operationalize complexity and define management strategies for solving environmental sustainability problems based on findings from psychology research. Second, we identify governance strategies that facilitate these management strategies. Linking those strategies suggests that the role of diverse institutions, actors, and interactions differs for five key dimensions of complexity: goals, variables, dynamics, interconnections, and informational uncertainty. The results strengthen systematic analyses of environmental sustainability problems in both theory and practice.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 87 条
[11]   Designing Public Participation Processes [J].
Bryson, John M. ;
Quick, Kathryn S. ;
Slotterback, Carissa Schively ;
Crosby, Barbara C. .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2013, 73 (01) :23-34
[12]  
Cooke B., 2001, PARTICIPATION NEW TY
[13]  
Creighton J.L., 2005, PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
[14]   Why don't well-educated adults understand accumulation? A challenge to researchers, educators, and citizens [J].
Cronin, Matthew A. ;
Gonzalez, Cleotilde ;
Sterman, John D. .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2009, 108 (01) :116-130
[15]   Developing and Testing a New Goal Taxonomy: Accounting for the Complexity of Ambiguity and Political Support [J].
Davis, Randall S. ;
Stazyk, Edmund C. .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2015, 25 (03) :751-775
[16]   Jury decision making - 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups [J].
Devine, DJ ;
Clayton, LD ;
Dunford, BB ;
Seying, R ;
Pryce, J .
PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW, 2001, 7 (03) :622-727
[17]   ON THE DIFFICULTIES PEOPLE HAVE IN DEALING WITH COMPLEXITY [J].
DOERNER, D .
SIMULATION & GAMING, 1980, 11 (01) :87-106
[18]  
Dorner D., 1996, The Logic of Failure: Recognizing and Avoiding Failure in Complex Situations
[19]   Governance and complexity - Emerging issues for governance theory [J].
Duit, Andreas ;
Galaz, Victor .
GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICY ADMINISTRATION AND INSTITUTIONS, 2008, 21 (03) :311-335
[20]   Governance, complexity, and resilience Introduction [J].
Duit, Andreas ;
Galaz, Victor ;
Eckerberg, Katarina ;
Ebbesson, Jonas .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2010, 20 (03) :363-368