Addressing Complexity in Environmental Management and Governance

被引:28
作者
Kirschke, Sabrina [1 ]
Newig, Jens [1 ]
机构
[1] Leuphana Univ Luneburg, Fac Sustainabil, Scharnhorststr 1, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany
关键词
complex problems; complex problem solving; governance; Integrated Water Resources Management; Water Framework Directive; wicked problems; WICKED PROBLEMS; STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION; DECISION-MAKING; PUBLIC-POLICY; WATER; CHALLENGES; SCIENCE; METAANALYSIS; COMMUNITIES; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.3390/su9060983
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Governance for complex problem solving has been increasingly discussed in environmental sustainability research. Above all, researchers continuously observe that sustainability problems are complex or "wicked", and suggest participatory models to address these problems in practice. In order to add to this debate, this study suggests a more differentiated theoretical approach to define governance for complex environmental problem solving than in previous studies. The approach consists of two vital steps: First, we operationalize complexity and define management strategies for solving environmental sustainability problems based on findings from psychology research. Second, we identify governance strategies that facilitate these management strategies. Linking those strategies suggests that the role of diverse institutions, actors, and interactions differs for five key dimensions of complexity: goals, variables, dynamics, interconnections, and informational uncertainty. The results strengthen systematic analyses of environmental sustainability problems in both theory and practice.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]   The concept of legalization [J].
Abbott, KW ;
Keohane, RO ;
Moravcsik, A ;
Slaughter, AM ;
Snidal, D .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2000, 54 (03) :401-+
[2]   Hard and soft law in international governance [J].
Abbott, KW ;
Snidal, D .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2000, 54 (03) :421-+
[3]   Dealing with the uncertainties of climate engineering: Warnings from a psychological complex problem solving perspective [J].
Amelung, Dorothee ;
Funke, Joachim .
TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2013, 35 (01) :32-40
[4]   Collaborative governance in theory and practice [J].
Ansell, Chris ;
Gash, Alison .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2008, 18 (04) :543-571
[5]  
Argyris C., 1999, ORG LEARNING, V2nd
[6]   Sustainability Science: Statement of the Friibergh Workshop on Sustainability Science [J].
Batie, Sandra S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 90 (05) :1176-1191
[7]   The quality of stakeholder-based decisions [J].
Beierle, TC .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2002, 22 (04) :739-749
[8]   Evaluating participation in WFD river basin management in England and Wales: Processes, communities, outputs and outcomes [J].
Benson, David ;
Fritsch, Oliver ;
Cook, Hadrian ;
Schmid, Marylise .
LAND USE POLICY, 2014, 38 :213-222
[9]   Goal specificity: A proxy measure for improvements in environmental outcomes in collaborative governance [J].
Biddle, Jennifer C. ;
Koontz, Tomas M. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 145 :268-276
[10]  
Brouwer H., 2019, MSP GUIDE DESIGN FAC, V3rd, DOI DOI 10.3362/9781780446691