Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach for open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the targeted vascular National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

被引:27
作者
Buck, Dominique B. [1 ,2 ]
Ultee, Klaas H. J. [1 ]
Zettervall, Sara L. [1 ]
Soden, Pete A. [1 ]
Darling, Jeremy [1 ]
Wyers, Mark [1 ]
van Herwaarden, Joost A. [2 ]
Schermerhorn, Marc L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Vasc & Endovasc Surg, Boston, MA USA
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Vasc Surg, Utrecht, Netherlands
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
EXTRAPERITONEAL APPROACH; HIGH-RISK; SURGERY; RECONSTRUCTION; DYSFUNCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2016.01.055
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: We sought to compare current practices in patient selection and 30-day outcomes for transperitoneal and retroperitoneal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repairs. Methods: All patients undergoing elective transperitoneal or retroperitoneal surgical repair for AAA between January 2011 and December 2013 were identified in the Targeted Vascular National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Emergency cases were excluded. Baseline characteristics, anatomic details, and intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were evaluated among those with infrarenal or juxtarenal AAA only. Results: We identified 1135 patients: 788 transperitoneal (69%) and 347 retroperitoneal (31%). When only infrarenal and juxtarenal AAAs were evaluated, the retroperitoneal patients were less likely to have an infrarenal clamp location (43% vs 68%) and had more renal revascularizations (15% vs 6%; P <.001), more visceral revascularizations (5.6% vs 2.4%; P=.014), and more lower extremity revascularizations (11% vs 7%; P =.021) compared with the transperitoneal approach. Postoperative mortality and return to the operating room were similar. Transperitoneal patients had a higher rate of wound dehiscence (2.4% vs 0.4%; P =.045), and retroperitoneal patients had higher incidence of pneumonia (9% vs 5%; P =.034), transfusion (77% vs 71%; P =.037), and reintubation (11% vs 7%; P =.034), and a longer median length of stay (8 vs 7 days; P =.048). After exclusion of all concomitant procedures, only transfusions remained more common in the retroperitoneal approach (78% vs 70%; P=.036). Multivariable analyses showed only higher rates of reintubation in the retroperitoneal group (odds ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-3.0; P =.047). Conclusions: The retroperitoneal approach is more commonly used for more proximal aneurysms and was associated with higher rates of pneumonia, reintubation, and transfusion, and a longer length of stay on univariate analyses. However, multivariable analysis demonstrated similar results between groups. The long-term benefits and frequency of reinterventions remain to be proven.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 591
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, US GUID 2013 ACS NSQ
[2]  
Arko FR, 2007, ACS SURG PRINCIPLES
[3]   Retroperitoneal Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Reduces Bowel Dysfunction [J].
Arya, Nityanand ;
Sharif, Muhammad Anees ;
Lau, Luk Louis ;
Lee, Bernard ;
Hannon, Raymond J. ;
Young, Ian S. ;
Soong, Chee Voon .
VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 43 (03) :262-270
[4]   Cost-effective aortic exposure: A retroperitoneal experience [J].
Ballard, JL ;
Yonemoto, H ;
Killeen, JD .
ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 14 (01) :1-5
[5]   Risk of Late-Onset Adhesions and Incisional Hernia Repairs after Surgery [J].
Bensley, Rodney P. ;
Schermerhorn, Marc L. ;
Hurks, Rob ;
Sachs, Teviah ;
Boyd, Christopher A. ;
O'Malley, A. James ;
Cotterill, Philip ;
Landon, Bruce E. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 216 (06) :1159-+
[6]   Retroperitoneal Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Offers Postoperative Benefits to Male Patients in the Veterans Affairs Health System [J].
Borkon, Matthew J. ;
Zaydfudim, Victor ;
Carey, Christopher D. ;
Brophy, Colleen M. ;
Guzman, Raul J. ;
Dattilo, Jeffery B. .
ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 24 (06) :728-732
[7]   TRANSPERITONEAL VERSUS RETROPERITONEAL APPROACH FOR AORTIC RECONSTRUCTION - A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
CAMBRIA, RP ;
BREWSTER, DC ;
ABBOTT, WM ;
FREEHAN, M ;
MEGERMAN, J ;
LAMURAGLIA, G ;
WILSON, R ;
WILSON, D ;
TEPLICK, R ;
DAVISON, JK .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1990, 11 (02) :314-325
[8]   The care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines [J].
Chaikof, Elliot L. ;
Brewster, David C. ;
Dalman, Ronald L. ;
Makaroun, Michel S. ;
Illig, Karl A. ;
Sicard, Gregorio A. ;
Timaran, Carlos H. ;
Upchurch, Gilbert R., Jr. ;
Veith, Frank J. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 50 :2S-49S
[9]  
DARLING RC, 1992, J CARDIOVASC SURG, V33, P65
[10]   Comparison between the transabdominal and retroperitoneal approaches for aortic reconstruction in patients at high risk [J].
Kirby, LB ;
Rosenthal, D ;
Atkins, CP ;
Brown, A ;
Matsuura, JH ;
Clark, MD ;
Pallos, L .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 30 (03) :400-405