SEISMIC STABILITY ANALYSIS OF INCA EARTHEN WALLS

被引:0
作者
Torres, Arturo [1 ]
Blondet, Marcial [1 ]
Santa Cruz, Sandra [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Peru PUCP, Secc Ingn Civil, Dept Ingn, Ave Univ 1801, Lima 15088, Peru
来源
12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF HISTORICAL CONSTRUCTIONS (SAHC 2021) | 2021年
关键词
Inca walls; Rocking; Adobe; Tapial; ROCKING RESPONSE; BLOCKS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In many places around the world there still exist statues, walls and columns which, despite being located in areas of high seismicity, are still standing and in good conditions after several hundred years. Although Peru is located on a zone of high seismicity, some preColumbian walls are still standing after having withstood many intense earthquakes. The remarkably stable dynamic response of these structures when rocking freely due to horizontal ground motions has been extensively studied [1] [2]. The aim of the project presented in this article is to evaluate the probability of seismic overturning of Inca monuments (XVth century CE) during future strong earthquakes. The Wiracocha temple walls located near Cusco and the Inca trail walls that cross the PUCP campus in Lima were selected for this study. Both earthen walls were modelled as free-standing rigid blocks which could rotate around the corners at their base. A set of synthetic ground acceleration signals were then generated according to the seismicity and ground conditions of both sites. The artificial ground acceleration records were scaled to the uniform hazard spectrum of Peru for return periods of 500, 1000 and 2500 years and different moment magnitudes [3] [4]. The rocking time history response of each wall due to these ground motions was then numerically computed and plotted in order to assess the seismic risk due to overturning of these important earthen monuments. The main conclusion is that these walls will most probably remain standing for many more centuries.
引用
收藏
页码:3133 / 3144
页数:12
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Is rocking motion predictable?
    Bachmann, J. A.
    Strand, M.
    Vassiliou, M. F.
    Broccardo, M.
    Stojadinovic, B.
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2018, 47 (02) : 535 - 552
  • [2] Chopra A., 2014, Dinamica de Estructuras, V4ta
  • [3] Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) & (ASCE) A. S. of C. E., 2000, PREST COMM SEISM REH
  • [4] Harris F.J., 1978, On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the Discrete Fourier Transform
  • [5] Housner GW, 1963, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., V53, P403, DOI [DOI 10.1785/BSSA0530020403, 10.1785/bssa0530020403]
  • [6] Rocking response of rigid blocks under near-source ground motions
    Makris, N
    Roussos, YS
    [J]. GEOTECHNIQUE, 2000, 50 (03): : 243 - 262
  • [7] A half-century of rocking isolation
    Makris, Nicos
    [J]. EARTHQUAKES AND STRUCTURES, 2014, 7 (06) : 1187 - 1221
  • [8] Manos G. C., 1995, T BUILT ENV, V8, P1
  • [9] Roncal M., 2017, DETERMINACION PELIGR
  • [10] Santa Cruz S., 2017, ESTIMACION PERDIDAS