Advancing the Science of Collaborative Problem Solving

被引:214
作者
Graesser, Arthur C. [1 ,2 ]
Fiore, Stephen M. [3 ,4 ]
Greiff, Samuel [5 ]
Andrews-Todd, Jessica [6 ]
Foltz, Peter W. [7 ,8 ]
Hesse, Friedrich W. [9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Memphis, Dept Psychol, 365 Innovat Dr,403B, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
[2] Univ Memphis, Inst Intelligent Syst, 365 Innovat Dr,403B, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
[3] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Philosophy, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[4] Univ Cent Florida, Inst Training & Simulat, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[5] Univ Luxembourg, Cognit Sci & Assessment, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
[6] Educ Testing Serv, Princeton, NJ USA
[7] Pearson, Boulder, CO USA
[8] Univ Colorado, Inst Cognit Sci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[9] Leibniz Inst Wissensmedien, Tubingen, Germany
[10] Univ Tubingen, Dept Appl Cognit & Media Psychol, Tubingen, Germany
关键词
assessment; collaboration; collaborative problem solving; education; groups; PISA; teams; FACE-TO-FACE; TEAM PERFORMANCE; SOCIAL CONTAGION; WORK; COHESION; METAANALYSIS; MEMORY; SKILLS; PERSONALITY; COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.1177/1529100618808244
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Collaborative problem solving (CPS) has been receiving increasing international attention because much of the complex work in the modern world is performed by teams. However, systematic education and training on CPS is lacking for those entering and participating in the workforce. In 2015, the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), a global test of educational progress, documented the low levels of proficiency in CPS. This result not only underscores a significant societal need but also presents an important opportunity for psychological scientists to develop, adopt, and implement theory and empirical research on CPS and to work with educators and policy experts to improve training in CPS. This article offers some directions for psychological science to participate in the growing attention to CPS throughout the world. First, it identifies the existing theoretical frameworks and empirical research that focus on CPS. Second, it provides examples of how recent technologies can automate analyses of CPS processes and assessments so that substantially larger data sets can be analyzed and so students can receive immediate feedback on their CPS performance. Third, it identifies some challenges, debates, and uncertainties in creating an infrastructure for research, education, and training in CPS. CPS education and assessment are expected to improve when supported by larger data sets and theoretical frameworks that are informed by psychological science. This will require interdisciplinary efforts that include expertise in psychological science, education, assessment, intelligent digital technologies, and policy.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 92
页数:34
相关论文
共 179 条
[1]   AN ANALYSIS OF COMMUNICATION AND THE USE OF MILITARY TERMS IN NAVY TEAM TRAINING [J].
ACHILLE, LB ;
SCHULZE, KG ;
SCHMIDTNIELSEN, A .
MILITARY PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 7 (02) :95-107
[2]  
American Management Association, 2012, EX SUMM AMA CRIT SKI
[3]   Effects of the timing and identity of retrieval cues in individual recall: An attempt to mimic cross-cueing in collaborative recall [J].
Andersson, J ;
Hitch, G .
MEMORY, 2006, 14 (01) :94-103
[4]   Partner Characteristics and Social Contagion: Does Group Composition Matter? [J].
Andrews, Jessica J. ;
Rapp, David N. .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 28 (04) :505-517
[5]  
Andrews JJ., 2015, Translational Issues in Psychological Science, V1, P182, DOI [DOI 10.1037/TPS0000025, 10.1037/tps0000025]
[6]  
Andrews-Todd J., 2018, P 11 INT C ED DAT MI, P239
[7]   Exploring social and cognitive dimensions of collaborative problem solving in an open online simulation-based task [J].
Andrews-Todd, Jessica ;
Forsyth, Carol M. .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2020, 104
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2017, PISA 2015 Results, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264285521-EN
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2008, TEAMBASED LEARNING H
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Fall short? College learning and career success