A Systematic Literature Review of Reviews on the Effectiveness of Chlamydia Testing

被引:6
|
作者
Wong, William Chi Wai [1 ,2 ]
Lau, Stephanie Tsz Hei [1 ]
Choi, Edmond Pui Hang [3 ]
Tucker, Joseph D. [4 ,5 ]
Fairley, Christopher K. [6 ,7 ]
Saunders, John M. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, LKS Fac Med, Dept Family Med & Primary Care, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Hong Kong, Shenzhen Hosp, Dept Gen Practice, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Hong Kong, LKS Fac Med, Sch Nursing, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Infect Dis, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[5] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Fac Infect & Trop Dis, London, England
[6] Alfred Hlth, Melbourne Sexual Hlth Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Monash Univ, Cent Clin Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[8] UCL, Ctr Clin Res Infect & Sexual Hlth, Inst Global Hlth, London, England
关键词
chlamydia; effectiveness; review; screening; sexually transmitted infections; SEXUALLY-TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS; COMMUNITY-BASED CHLAMYDIA; TRACHOMATIS INFECTIONS; SCREENING-PROGRAM; UNITED-STATES; GONORRHEA; EMERGENCY; DISEASE; INTERVENTIONS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1093/epirev/mxz007
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Chlamydia trachomatis is the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection, causing significant morbidity and economic burden. Strategies like national screening programs or home-testing kits were introduced in some developed countries, yet their effectiveness remains controversial. In this systematic review, we examined reviews of chlamydia screening interventions to assess their effectiveness and the elements that contribute to their success to guide public policy and future research. We assessed English material published after 2000 in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the British Nursing Index, Medical Database, and Sociological Abstracts, in addition to World Health Organization Global Health Sector Strategies, the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control guidelines, and the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. Systematic reviews that focused on chlamydia screening interventions were included. Using the socioecological model, we examined the levels of interventions that may affect the uptake of chlamydia screening. A total of 19 systematic reviews were included. Self-collection in home-testing kits significantly increased screening among girls and women 14-50 years of age. At the organizational level, using electronic health records and not creating additional costs facilitated testing. At the community level, outreach interventions in community and parent centers and homeless shelters achieved high screening rates. At the policy level, interventions with educational and advisory elements could result in significant improvements in screening rates.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 175
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Examining the theory-effectiveness hypothesis: A systematic review of systematic reviews
    Dalgetty, Rebecca
    Miller, Christopher B.
    Dombrowski, Stephan U.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 24 (02) : 334 - 356
  • [22] Screening for chlamydia and/or gonorrhea in primary health care: systematic reviews on effectiveness and patient preferences
    Pillay, Jennifer
    Wingert, Aireen
    MacGregor, Tara
    Gates, Michelle
    Vandermeer, Ben
    Hartling, Lisa
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [23] Text-mining Techniques and Tools for Systematic Literature Reviews: A Systematic Literature Review
    Feng, Luyi
    Chiam, Yin Kia
    Lo, Sin Kuang
    2017 24TH ASIA-PACIFIC SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (APSEC 2017), 2017, : 41 - 50
  • [24] Sentiment Analysis for Hotel Reviews: A Systematic Literature Review
    Ameur, Asma
    Hamdi, Sana
    Ben Yahia, Sadok
    ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2024, 56 (02)
  • [25] Assessment of therapeutic safety in systematic reviews: literature review
    Ernst, E
    Pittler, MH
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7312): : 546 - 546
  • [26] Systematic reviews of machine learning in healthcare: a literature review
    Kolasa, Katarzyna
    Admassu, Bisrat
    Holownia-Voloskova, Malwina
    Kedzior, Katarzyna J.
    Poirrier, Jean-Etienne
    Perni, Stefano
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (01) : 63 - 115
  • [27] A NON-SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW OF LITERATURE REVIEWS: EVALUATION OF METHODS IMPLEMENTED AND LANGUAGE USED TO DESCRIBE SYSTEMATIC AND NON-SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEWS
    Brown, A. E.
    Los, A. K.
    Goldsmith-Martin, G.
    Phalguni, A.
    Bowes, K.
    Briggs, J. A.
    Bajko, P.
    Kilty, R. L. H.
    Khankhel, Z. S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (06) : S404 - S404
  • [28] A/B testing: A systematic literature review
    Quin, Federico
    Weyns, Danny
    Galster, Matthias
    Silva, Camila Costa
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2024, 211
  • [29] Updating the relationship of Chlamydia pneumoniae with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review of reviews
    Filardo, Simone
    Di Pietro, Marisa
    Romano, Silvio
    Sessa, Rosa
    NEW MICROBIOLOGICA, 2024, 47 (03): : 217 - 226
  • [30] Systematic review:: Noninvasive testing for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae
    Cook, RL
    Hutchison, SL
    Ostergaard, L
    Braithwaite, RS
    Ness, RB
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 142 (11) : 914 - 925