Intrasession repeatability and intersession reproducibility of peripapillary OCTA vessel parameters in non-glaucomatous and glaucomatous eyes

被引:23
|
作者
Lee, Jae Chang [1 ]
Grisafe, Dominic J. [1 ]
Burkemper, Bruce [1 ]
Chang, Brenda R. [1 ]
Zhou, Xiao [2 ]
Chu, Zhongdi [2 ]
Fard, Ali [3 ]
Durbin, Mary [3 ]
Wong, Brandon J. [1 ]
Song, Brian J. [1 ]
Xu, Benjamin Y. [1 ]
Wang, Ruikang [2 ]
Richter, Grace M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Ophthalmol, 1450 San Pablo St,Suite 4700, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Bioengn, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc, Dublin, CA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Glaucoma; Imaging; Optic Nerve; COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY; OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA; MACULAR PERFUSION; CAPILLARY DENSITY; OPTIC-NERVE; DETERMINANTS; RETINA;
D O I
10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-317181
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Objective To compare intrasession repeatability versus intersession reproducibility of the peripapillary vessel parameters using optical microangiography-based optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in non-glaucomatous and glaucomatous eyes. Methods In an observational, longitudinal study, peripapillary OCTA scans were collected to evaluate intrasession repeatability and intersession reproducibility using within-eye coefficient of variation (CVW) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Images were quantified using a custom research-oriented quantification software calculating vessel area density (VAD) and flux and a commercially developed, clinic-oriented quantification software (Cirrus 11.0, Carl Zeiss Meditec) calculating perfusion density (PD) and flux index (FI). Effect of signal strength on the reliability of OCTA parameters was also evaluated. Results Among 120 non-glaucomatous eyes, intrasession CVW were 4.2% for VAD, 5.3% for flux, 1.5% for PD and 2.0% for FI. The intersession CVW were 6.5% for VAD, 8.0% for flux, 2.0% for PD and 3.2% for FI. The intrasession ICC ranged from 0.928 to 0.945, and intersession ICC ranged from 0.811 to 0.866. From 118 glaucomatous eyes, intrasession CVW was 9.0% for VAD, 10.3% for flux, 1.7% for PD and 2.3% for FI. The intersession CVW was 12.1% for VAD, 14.2% for flux, 2.3% for PD and 3.5% for FI. The intrasession ICC ranged from 0.904 to 0.972, and intersession ICC ranged from 0.855 to 0.955. Signal strength was significantly positively associated with OCTA vessel parameters (p<0.0001) for both groups. Conclusion Peripapillary OCTA vessel parameters had greater intrasession repeatability compared to intersession reproducibility in both non-glaucomatous and glaucomatous eyes. The built-in commercially developed quantification software demonstrated greater agreement than the custom research-oriented quantification software.
引用
收藏
页码:1534 / 1541
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [31] Comparison of Diagnostic Ability Between Wide- Field Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging Maps and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 Optic Nerve Head Assessment to Discriminate Glaucomatous and Non-glaucomatous Eyes
    Kourkoutas, Dimitrios
    Triantafyllopoulos, George
    Georgiou, Iordanis
    Karamaounas, Aristotelis
    Karamaounas, Nikolaos
    Sotiropulos, Konstadinos
    Kapralos, Dimitrios
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (08)
  • [32] Comparison of intraocular pressure peak and fluctuations among Filipino patients with non-glaucomatous eyes and glaucoma suspects using water drinking test and diurnal intraocular pressure
    Koh, Anelisa
    Verzosa, Cynthia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 14 (11) : 1729 - 1734
  • [33] Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCTA) Differences in Vessel Perfusion Density and Flux Index of the Optic Nerve and Peri-Papillary Area in Healthy, Glaucoma Suspect and Glaucomatous Eyes
    Yospon, Trailuk
    Rojananuangnit, Kulawan
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 17 : 3011 - 3021
  • [34] Repeatability and comparability of peripapillary vessel density measurements of high-density and non-high-density optical coherence tomography angiography scans in normal and glaucoma eyes
    Venugopal, Jayasree P.
    Rao, Harsha Laxmana
    Weinreb, Robert N.
    Dasari, Srilakshmi
    Riyazuddin, Mohammed
    Pradhan, Zia Sultan
    Puttaiah, Narendra K.
    Devi, Sathi
    Mansouri, Kaweh
    Webers, Carroll A. B.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 103 (07) : 949 - 954