The restrictions of the freedom of information during the Covid-19 pandemic

被引:2
作者
Kalitenko, Oksana [1 ]
Anikinar, Galyna [2 ]
Spasova, Ekaterina [1 ]
Shahaka, Oleksandra [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ, Odesa Law Acad, Civil Law Dept, Odesa, Ukraine
[2] Leonid Yuzkov Khmelnytskyi Univ Management & Law, Dept Civillaw & Proc, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine
来源
CUESTIONES POLITICAS | 2021年 / 39卷 / 70期
关键词
freedom of Information; freedom of Speech; Covid-19; Restrictions; Human Rights;
D O I
10.46398/cuestpol.3970.26
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The article is devoted to the study of the issues of restrictions on the freedom of information that has arisen under the impact of the novel coronavirus outbreak. Another goal of the paper is identifying ways to protect such rights or to indicate which amendments to the law might be of use. The research methodology is based on general and special scientific methods, in particular: analytical, comparative-legal, systemic, and structural. The structure of the work includes: the review of international and Ukrainian legislation related to the freedom of information; the possibilities of its restriction; possible ways to enabling safe and secure management of the freedom of information during the coronacrisis. An analysis of international experience was carried out, as well as aspects of the protection of civil liberties such as freedom of speech, the right of peaceful assembly, etc. Several problematic issues were identified. Although, the general results of the study can be interpreted as alarming trends in the field of human rights and civil liberties. Particularly, it is multiple violations of the freedom of information all around the world under quarantine restrictions.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 445
页数:20
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], Legal Fellow and Co-Manager of the Supreme Court and Appellate Advocacy Program in the Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Report of the Committee on the Rights of Women Migrant Workers, P36
[3]  
AUSEYUSHKIN Yan, 2020, GUARDIAN
[4]  
Bush Daniel, 2020, Stanford Internet Observatory, blog post
[5]  
CABINET OF MINISTERS OF UKRAINE, 2006, APPROVAL RULES ENSUR
[6]  
CABINET OF MINISTERS OF UKRAINE, 2020, HOM ACT APPL WORK
[7]  
CIVIL COURT OF CASSATION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF UKRAINE, 2020, 346570017 JUDG
[8]  
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF UKRAINE, 2020, LAW REV KYIV U LAW
[9]   Changes in public preferences for technologically enhanced surveillance following the COVID-19 pandemic: a discrete choice experiment [J].
Degeling, Chris ;
Chen, Gang ;
Gilbert, Gwendolyn L. ;
Brookes, Victoria ;
Thai, Thi ;
Wilson, Andrew ;
Johnson, Jane .
BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (11)
[10]  
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, 2016, HDB ART 15 EUR CONV