A new key pole for the East European Craton at 1452 Ma: Palaeomagnetic and geochronological constraints from mafic rocks in the Lake Ladoga region (Russian Karelia)

被引:44
作者
Lubnina, Natalia V. [1 ]
Mertanen, Satu [2 ]
Soderlund, Ulf [3 ]
Bogdanova, Svetlana [3 ]
Vasilieva, Tatiana I. [4 ]
Frank-Kamenetsky, Dmitry [5 ]
机构
[1] Moscow MV Lomonosov State Univ, Dept Dynam Geol, Moscow 119992, Russia
[2] Geol Survey Finland, FI-02151 Espoo, Finland
[3] Lund Univ, Dept Earth & Ecosyst Sci, SE-22362 Lund, Sweden
[4] RAS, Inst Geol, Moscow 119017, Russia
[5] State Co Mineral St Petersburg, St Petersburg, Russia
关键词
Palaeomagnetism; Mesoproterozoic; East European Craton; Baltica; U-Pb baddeleyite; Columbia; PALEO-MESOPROTEROZOIC SUPERCONTINENT; BALTIC SHIELD; SVECOFENNIAN OROGEN; SIBERIA; LAURENTIA; CONFIGURATION; EVOLUTION; PALEOINTENSITY; BASEMENT; HISTORY;
D O I
10.1016/j.precamres.2010.02.014
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Palaeomagnetic and geochronological studies on mafic rocks in the Lake Ladoga region in South Russian Karelia provide a new, reliably dated Mesoproterozoic key paleopole for the East European Craton (Baltica). U-Pb dating on baddeleyite gives a crystallisation age of 1452 +/- 12 Ma for one of the studied dolerite dykes. A mean palaeomagnetic pole for the Mesoproterozoic dolerite dykes. Valaam sill and Salmi basalts yields a paleopole at 15.2 degrees N, 177.1 degrees E, A(95) = 5.5 degrees. Positive baked contact test for the dolerite dykes and positive reversal test for the Salmi basalts and for the dykes confirm the primary nature of the magnetisation. Comparison of this Baltica palaeopole with coeval paleomagnetic data for Laurentia and Siberia provides a revised palaeoposition of these cratons. The results verify that the East European Craton, Laurentia and Siberia were part of the supercontinent Columbia from the Late Palaeoproterozoic to the Middle Neoproterozoic. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:442 / 462
页数:21
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]  
Amantov A., 1996, 99113 GEOL SURV FINL, P99
[2]   Chronology of multiphase emplacement of the Salmi rapakivi granite-anorthosite complex, Baltic Shield: Implications for magmatic evolution [J].
Amelin, YV ;
Larin, AM ;
Tucker, RD .
CONTRIBUTIONS TO MINERALOGY AND PETROLOGY, 1997, 127 (04) :353-368
[3]  
[Anonymous], THESIS VRIJE U AMSTE
[4]  
BOGDANOV YB, 2003, ISOTOPE GEOCHRONOLOG, P71
[5]   The East European Craton (Baltica) before and during the assembly of Rodinia [J].
Bogdanova, S. V. ;
Bingen, B. ;
Gorbatschev, R. ;
Kheraskova, T. N. ;
Kozlov, V. I. ;
Puchkov, V. N. ;
Volozh, Yu. A. .
PRECAMBRIAN RESEARCH, 2008, 160 (1-2) :23-45
[6]   Riphean rifting and major Palaeoproterozoic crustal boundaries in the basement of the East European Craton: Geology and geophysics [J].
Bogdanova, SV ;
Pashkevich, IK ;
Gorbatschev, R ;
Orlyuk, MI .
TECTONOPHYSICS, 1996, 268 (1-4) :1-21
[7]   Mesoproterozoic (1.47-1.44 Ga) orogenic magmatism in Fennoscandia; Baddeleyite U-Pb dating of a suite of massif-type anorthosite in S. Sweden [J].
Brander, Linus ;
Soderlund, Ulf .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES, 2009, 98 (03) :499-516
[8]  
BUCHAN KL, 1990, INT GEOL C, P209
[9]   Comparing the drift of Laurentia and Baltica in the Proterozoic:: the importance of key palaeomagnetic poles [J].
Buchan, KL ;
Mertanen, S ;
Park, RG ;
Pesonen, LJ ;
Elming, SÅ ;
Abrahamsen, N ;
Bylund, G .
TECTONOPHYSICS, 2000, 319 (03) :167-198