Complications of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS): a prospective audit

被引:40
作者
Bignell, M. B. [1 ]
Ramwell, A. [1 ]
Evans, J. R. [1 ]
Dastur, N. [1 ]
Simson, J. N. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Richards Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Chichester PO19 6SE, W Sussex, England
关键词
Transanal endoscopic microsurgery; rectal; tumour; resection; URINARY RETENTION; RISK-FACTORS; LOCAL RECURRENCE; RESECTION; EXCISION; ADENOMAS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02071.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The aim of this study was to determine the postoperative complications of Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEMS) excision of rectal lesions. Method A prospective audit of 262 consecutive TEMS procedures performed by a single surgeon between 1999 and 2008. Results The mean age of patients was 72 years. The mean area of the lesions excised was 17.5 cm(2) with a mean diameter of 4.5 cm at a mean distance of 7.4 cm from the dentate line. There were 201 full thickness excisions, 51 partial thickness excisions and nine were mixed or unclassified. Thirty-three (13%) patients developed 41 complications. There were two (0.8%) deaths within 30 days. Pelvic sepsis occurred in seven (3%) patients and was significantly more common after excision of low lesions within 2 cm of the dentate line. Postoperative haemorrhage occurred in seven (3%) patients and was significantly less common when dissection was performed with ultrasonic dissection than with diathermy. Fourteen (5%) patients developed acute urinary retention. Four (1.5%) patients developed rectal stenosis and four (1.5%) suffered uncomplicated surgical emphysema that required no treatment. Conclusions Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is a safe operation with a low mortality and morbidity. Pelvic sepsis is more common after excision of lesions within 2 cm of the dentate line. Ultrasonic dissection is associated with less postoperative haemorrhage than diathermy.
引用
收藏
页码:E99 / E103
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Rectal adenocarcinoma and transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Diagnostic challenges, indications and short term results in 142 consecutive patients [J].
Baatrup, G. ;
Elbrond, H. ;
Hesselfeldt, P. ;
Wille-Jorgensen, P. ;
Moller, P. ;
Breum, B. ;
Qvist, N. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2007, 22 (11) :1347-1352
[2]  
Banerjee AK, 1996, BRIT J SURG, V83, P211, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1996.02082.x
[3]  
BUESS G, 1984, COLOPROCTOLOGY, V1, P254
[4]   Recurrence and survival after mesorectal excision for rectal cancer [J].
Bülow, S ;
Christensen, IJ ;
Harling, H ;
Kronborg, O ;
Fenger, C ;
Nielsen, HJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (08) :974-980
[5]   Urinary retention after haemorrhoidectomy: Impact of stapled haemorrhoidectomy [J].
Chik, Barbara ;
Law, Wai Lun ;
Choi, Hok Kwok .
ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 29 (04) :233-237
[6]   Life threatening sepsis and mortality following stapled hemorrhoidopexy [J].
Cirocco, Williaim C. .
SURGERY, 2008, 143 (06) :824-829
[7]   Per-anal excision of large, rectal, villous adenomase [J].
Featherstone, JM ;
Grabham, JA ;
Fozard, JB .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2004, 47 (01) :86-89
[8]   Anorectal sphincter function and rectal barostat study in patients following transanal endoscopic microsurgery [J].
Herman, RM ;
Richter, P ;
Walega, P ;
Popiela, T .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2001, 16 (06) :370-376
[9]   Colonoscopic resection of lateral spreading tumours: a prospective analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection [J].
Hurlstone, DP ;
Sanders, DS ;
Cross, SS ;
Adam, I ;
Shorthouse, AJ ;
Brown, S ;
Drew, K ;
Lobo, AJ .
GUT, 2004, 53 (09) :1334-1339
[10]   A prospective analysis of extended endoscopic mucosal resection for large rectal villous adenomas: an alternative technique to transanal endoscopic microsurgery [J].
Hurlstone, DP ;
Sanders, DS ;
Cross, SS ;
George, R ;
Shorthouse, AJ ;
Brown, S .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2005, 7 (04) :339-344