Dual-energy chest radiography with a flat-panel digital detector:: Revealing calcified chest abnormalities

被引:65
作者
Fischbach, F [1 ]
Freund, T [1 ]
Röttgen, R [1 ]
Engert, U [1 ]
Felix, R [1 ]
Ricke, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Sch Med, Charite, Dept Radiol, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.181.6.1811519
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The aim of this study was to assess the value of dual-energy chest radiography obtained using a cesium iodide flat-panel detector in addition to standard posteroanterior chest radiography for the detection of calcified chest abnormalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study included 20 patients with a total of 37 calcified chest lesions (16 pulmonary nodules, 17 mediastinal calcifications, and four pleural calcifications) as confirmed on CT. Twenty-eight locations in the chests of the same patients who were free of lesions were used as negative controls. Four radiologists reviewed posteroanterior chest radiographs in a blinded manner alone and in conjunction with dual-energy soft-tissue and bone images. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, the negative predictive value (NPV), and the positive predictive value (PPV) for lesion prediction. The Wilcoxon's and the Brunner and Langer's tests were performed for statistical analysis. RESULTS. For posteroanterior chest radiography, sensitivity was 36%, the PPV was 64%, and the NPV was 47%. When dual-energy images were added, sensitivity increased significantly to 66% (p < 0.05), the PPV to 76%, and the NPV to 62%. The specificity remained constant at 73%. Brunner and Langer's test revealed a highly significant difference between posteroanterior chest radiography and dual-energy imaging in the detection of calcified chest abnormalities (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION. Dual-energy images added to standard posteroanterior chest radiographs significantly improve the detection of calcified chest lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:1519 / 1524
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Comparison of low contrast detectability between a digital amorphous silicon and a screen-film based imaging system for thoracic radiography [J].
Aufrichtig, R .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (07) :1349-1358
[2]   Effective dose reduction in dual-energy flat panel X-ray imaging:: Technique and clinical evaluation [J].
Avinash, GB ;
Jabri, KN ;
Uppaluri, R ;
Rader, A ;
Fischbach, F ;
Ricke, J ;
Teichgräber, U .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2002: IMAGE PROCESSING, VOL 1-3, 2002, 4684 :1048-1059
[3]   The solitary pulmonary nodule on chest radiography: Can we really tell if the nodule is calcified! [J].
Berger, WG ;
Erly, WK ;
Krupinski, EA ;
Standen, JR ;
Stern, RG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (01) :201-204
[4]   A METHOD FOR SELECTIVE TISSUE AND BONE VISUALIZATION USING DUAL ENERGY SCANNED PROJECTION RADIOGRAPHY [J].
BRODY, WR ;
BUTT, G ;
HALL, A ;
MACOVSKI, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1981, 8 (03) :353-357
[5]  
BURNNER E, 1999, NONPARAMETRICAL ANAL, P1
[6]   Pulmonary nodules: Experimental and clinical studies at low-dose CT [J].
Diederich, S ;
Lenzen, H ;
Windmann, R ;
Puskas, Z ;
Yelbuz, TM ;
Henneken, S ;
Klaiber, T ;
Eameri, M ;
Roos, N ;
Peters, PE .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (01) :289-298
[7]   Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: Image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography [J].
Fink, C ;
Hallscheidt, PJ ;
Noeldge, G ;
Kampschulte, A ;
Radeleff, B ;
Hosch, WP ;
Kauffmann, GW ;
Hansmann, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 178 (02) :481-486
[8]   Flat panel digital radiography compared with storage phosphor computed radiography - Assessment of dose versus image quality in phantom studies [J].
Fischbach, F ;
Ricke, J ;
Freund, T ;
Werk, M ;
Spors, B ;
Baumann, C ;
Pech, M ;
Felix, R .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2002, 37 (11) :609-614
[9]  
Fraser RG, 1988, DIAGNOSIS DIS CHEST, P458
[10]   Performance of a 41X41-cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector for radiographic imaging applications [J].
Granfors, PR ;
Aufrichtig, R .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (06) :1324-1331