Task type as a moderator of positive/negative feedback effects on motivation and performance: A regulatory focus perspective

被引:205
作者
Van Dijk, Dina [1 ]
Kluger, Avraham N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Dept Hlth Syst Management, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel
[2] Hebrew Univ Mt Scopus, Jerusalem Sch Business Adm, Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
feedback; feedback sign; motivation; performance; regulatory focus; prevention and promotion foci; task type; IMPLICIT THEORIES; PREVENTION; PROMOTION; FIT; DECISION; INTERVENTIONS; COMPLEXITY; LEADERSHIP; STRENGTH; ABILITY;
D O I
10.1002/job.725
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Applying Higgins' regulatory focus theory, we hypothesized that the effect of positive/negative feedback on motivation and performance is moderated by task type, which is argued to be an antecedent to situational regulatory focus (promotion or prevention). Thus, first we demonstrated that some tasks (e.g., tasks requiring creativity) are perceived as promotion tasks, whereas others (e. g., those requiring vigilance and attention to detail) are perceived as prevention tasks. Second, as expected, our tests in two studies of the moderation hypothesis showed that positive feedback increased self-reported motivation (meta-analysis across samples: N = 315, d = 0.43) and actual performance (N = 55, d = 0.67) among people working on promotion tasks, relative to negative feedback. Positive feedback, however, decreased motivation (N = 318, d = -0.33) and performance (N = 55, d = -0.37) among individuals working on prevention tasks, relative to negative feedback. These findings suggest that (a) performance of different tasks can affect regulatory focus and (b) variability in positive/negative feedback effects can be partially explained by regulatory focus and task type. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1084 / 1105
页数:22
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, INTRO META ANAL
[2]   The effects of feedback format on dynamic decision making [J].
Atkins, PWB ;
Wood, RE ;
Rutgers, PJ .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2002, 88 (02) :587-604
[3]   A Meta-Analysis of 25 Years of Mood-Creativity Research: Hedonic Tone, Activation, or Regulatory Focus? [J].
Baas, Matthijs ;
De Dreu, Carsten K. W. ;
Nijstad, Bernard A. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2008, 134 (06) :779-806
[4]   How "fun/importance" fit affects performance: Relating implicit theories to instructions [J].
Bianco, AT ;
Higgins, ET ;
Klem, A .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2003, 29 (09) :1091-1103
[5]   Regulatory focus and the probability estimates of conjunctive and disjunctive events [J].
Brockner, J ;
Paruchuri, S ;
Idson, LC ;
Higgins, ET .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2002, 87 (01) :5-24
[6]   Regulatory focus theory: Implications for the study of emotions at work [J].
Brockner, J ;
Higgins, ET .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2001, 86 (01) :35-66
[7]   Making judgments about ability: The role of implicit theories of ability in moderating inferences from temporal and social comparison information [J].
Butler, R .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 78 (05) :965-978
[8]   Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making [J].
Crowe, E ;
Higgins, ET .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1997, 69 (02) :117-132
[9]   Feedback effectiveness: Can 360-degree appraisals be improved? [J].
DeNisi, AS ;
Kluger, AN .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE, 2000, 14 (01) :129-139
[10]   A SOCIAL COGNITIVE APPROACH TO MOTIVATION AND PERSONALITY [J].
DWECK, CS ;
LEGGETT, EL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1988, 95 (02) :256-273