BIAS REDUCTION FOR DYNAMIC NONLINEAR PANEL MODELS WITH FIXED EFFECTS

被引:96
作者
Hahn, Jinyong [2 ]
Kuersteiner, Guido [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Dept Econ, Washington, DC 20057 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0266466611000028
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The fixed effects estimator of panel models can be severely biased because of well-known incidental parameter problems. It is shown that this bias can be reduced in nonlinear dynamic panel models. We consider asymptotics where n and T grow at the same rate as an approximation that facilitates comparison of bias properties. Under these asymptotics, the bias-corrected estimators we propose are centered at the truth, whereas fixed effects estimators are not. We discuss several examples and provide Monte Carlo evidence for the small sample performance of our procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:1152 / 1191
页数:40
相关论文
共 35 条
[11]  
Hahn J., 2010, BIAS REDUCTION DYNAM
[12]   Stationarity and mixing properties of the dynamic Tobit model [J].
Hahn, Jinyong ;
Kuersteiner, Guido .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2010, 107 (02) :105-111
[13]   Asymptotically unbiased inference for a dynamic panel model with fixed effects when both n and T are large [J].
Hahn, JY ;
Kuersteiner, G .
ECONOMETRICA, 2002, 70 (04) :1639-1657
[14]   Bootstrap critical values for tests based on generalized-method-of-moments estimators [J].
Hall, P ;
Horowitz, JL .
ECONOMETRICA, 1996, 64 (04) :891-916
[15]  
Hall P., 1980, Martingale Limit Theory and Its Application
[16]   STRONG LAWS FOR DEPENDENT HETEROGENEOUS PROCESSES [J].
HANSEN, BE .
ECONOMETRIC THEORY, 1991, 7 (02) :213-221
[17]  
Heckman J.J., 1981, The Incidental Parameters Problem and the Problem of Initial Conditions in Estimating a Discrete Time-Discrete Data Stochastic Process
[18]  
Heckman J.J., 1981, STUDIES LABOR MARKET
[19]   A LIFE-CYCLE MODEL OF FEMALE LABOR SUPPLY [J].
HECKMAN, JJ ;
MACURDY, TE .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1980, 47 (01) :47-74
[20]   Sales and consumer inventory [J].
Hendel, Igal ;
Nevo, Aviv .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2006, 37 (03) :543-561