Canadian Care Providers' and Pregnant Women's Approaches to Managing Birth: Minimizing Risk While Maximizing Integrity

被引:35
作者
Hall, Wendy A. [1 ]
Tomkinson, Jocelyn [2 ]
Klein, Michael C.
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Sch Nursing, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Matern Care Res Grp, Child & Family Res Inst, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
childbirth; grounded theory; health care professionals; pregnancy; women's issues; CESAREAN-SECTION; MATERNITY CARE; CHILDBIRTH; LABOR; DELIVERY; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1177/1049732311424292
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
We employed grounded theory to explain how Canadian pregnant women and care providers manage birth. The sample comprised 9 pregnant women and 56 intrapartum care providers (family doctors, midwives, nurses, obstetricians, and doulas [individuals providing labor support]). We collected data from 2008 to 2009, using focus groups that included care providers and pregnant women. Using concurrent data collection and analysis, we generated the core category: minimizing risk while maximizing integrity. Women and providers used strategies to minimize risk and maximize integrity, which included accepting or resisting recommendations for surveillance and recommendations for interventions, and plotting courses vs. letting events unfold. Strategies were influenced by evidence, relationships, and local health cultures, and led to feelings of weakness or strength, confidence or uncertainty, and differing power- and responsibility-sharing arrangements. The findings highlight difficulties resisting surveillance and interventions in a risk-adverse culture, and the need for attention to processes of giving birth.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 586
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[11]  
Canadian Institute of Health Information, 2009, HLTH IND REP CES SEC
[12]   Explaining obstetric interventionism: Technical skills, common conceptualisations, or collective countertransference? [J].
Cherniak, Donna ;
Fisher, Jane .
WOMENS STUDIES INTERNATIONAL FORUM, 2008, 31 (04) :270-277
[13]   Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? [J].
Coyne, IT .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1997, 26 (03) :623-630
[14]   Mothers' reports of their maternity experiences in the USA and Canada [J].
Declercq, Eugene ;
Chalmers, Beverley .
JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE AND INFANT PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 26 (04) :295-308
[15]   Symbolic interactionism and the concept of power [J].
Dennis, A ;
Martin, PJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2005, 56 (02) :191-213
[16]   Expert intrapartum maternity care: a meta-synthesis [J].
Downe, Soo ;
Simpson, Louise ;
Trafford, Katriona .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2007, 57 (02) :127-140
[17]   The Life of a Canadian Doula: Successes, Confusion, and Conflict [J].
Eftekhary, Sahba ;
Klein, Michael C. ;
Xu, Shi Yi .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2010, 32 (07) :642-649
[18]   Revisiting the critique of medicalized childbirth - A contribution to the sociology of birth [J].
Fox, B ;
Worts, D .
GENDER & SOCIETY, 1999, 13 (03) :326-346
[19]   Women's preference for a cesarean section: Incidence and associated factors [J].
Gamble, JA ;
Creedy, DK .
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2001, 28 (02) :101-110
[20]  
Glaser B. G., 1978, [No title captured]