Canadian Care Providers' and Pregnant Women's Approaches to Managing Birth: Minimizing Risk While Maximizing Integrity

被引:35
作者
Hall, Wendy A. [1 ]
Tomkinson, Jocelyn [2 ]
Klein, Michael C.
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Sch Nursing, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Matern Care Res Grp, Child & Family Res Inst, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
childbirth; grounded theory; health care professionals; pregnancy; women's issues; CESAREAN-SECTION; MATERNITY CARE; CHILDBIRTH; LABOR; DELIVERY; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1177/1049732311424292
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
We employed grounded theory to explain how Canadian pregnant women and care providers manage birth. The sample comprised 9 pregnant women and 56 intrapartum care providers (family doctors, midwives, nurses, obstetricians, and doulas [individuals providing labor support]). We collected data from 2008 to 2009, using focus groups that included care providers and pregnant women. Using concurrent data collection and analysis, we generated the core category: minimizing risk while maximizing integrity. Women and providers used strategies to minimize risk and maximize integrity, which included accepting or resisting recommendations for surveillance and recommendations for interventions, and plotting courses vs. letting events unfold. Strategies were influenced by evidence, relationships, and local health cultures, and led to feelings of weakness or strength, confidence or uncertainty, and differing power- and responsibility-sharing arrangements. The findings highlight difficulties resisting surveillance and interventions in a risk-adverse culture, and the need for attention to processes of giving birth.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 586
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Adam B., 2000, RISK SOC, P1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Emergence vs Forcing: Basics of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Brokerage and Closure
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, HDB QUALITATIVE RES
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, QUALITATIVE RES HLTH, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781119410867
[6]  
Beck-Gernsheim E., 1996, RISK ENV MODERNITY N, P122
[7]  
Blumer Herbert, 1969, SYMB INTERACT
[8]   Risk, theory, social and medical models: A critical analysis of the concept of risk in maternity care [J].
Bryers, Helen MacKenzie ;
van Teijlingen, Edwin .
MIDWIFERY, 2010, 26 (05) :488-496
[9]   Male appropriation and medicalization of childbirth: an historical analysis [J].
Cahill, HA .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2001, 33 (03) :334-342
[10]  
Canadian Association of Midwives, 2004, POS STAT EL CES SECT