Relationship of Social Network Size to Infant Birth Weight in Hispanic and Non-Hispanic Women

被引:11
作者
Dyer, Jane M. [1 ]
Hunter, Rosemarie [2 ]
Murphy, Patricia A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Coll Nursing, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Coll Social Work, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
关键词
Latina paradox; Social network size; Low birth weight; MEXICAN-AMERICAN WOMEN; UNITED-STATES-BORN; EPIDEMIOLOGIC PARADOX; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; PREGNANCY OUTCOMES; STRESS; CARE; POPULATION; DELIVERY; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1007/s10903-010-9331-y
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The "Latina paradox" describes the phenomenon of women born in Mexico having their babies in the US deliver fewer low birth weight babies than White US born women. Social support and networks have been suggested as factors in this paradox. Network size was included in Utah's Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring Survey (PRAMS) for 4 years. Through an analysis of linked Birth Certificate and PRAMS data, the relationship between birth weight and social networks of four groups of women were examined. Perhaps due to Utah's unique population characteristics and service-oriented culture, the "Latina paradox" was not demonstrated. However, the study did demonstrate that specific social network size options were positively associated with birth weight, and husbands in either culture (White or Hispanic) appear to be the main source of social support. In addition, this study reinforced the importance of carefully planned and executed surveys that are culturally appropriate.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 493
页数:7
相关论文
共 52 条
[11]   Traveling through the cancer trajectory: Social support perceived by women with gynecologic cancer in Hong Kong [J].
Chan, CWH ;
Molassiotis, A ;
Yam, BMC ;
Chan, SJ ;
Lam, CSW .
CANCER NURSING, 2001, 24 (05) :387-394
[12]   PREVALENCE OF LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT AMONG HISPANIC INFANTS WITH UNITED STATES-BORN AND FOREIGN-BORN MOTHERS - THE EFFECT OF URBAN POVERTY [J].
COLLINS, JW ;
SHAY, DK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 139 (02) :184-192
[13]   What's so bad about teenage pregnancy? [J].
Cunnington, AJ .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY PLANNING AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2001, 27 (01) :36-41
[14]   Determinants of birthweight inequalities: Population-based study [J].
Dubois, Lise ;
Girard, Manon .
PEDIATRICS INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 48 (05) :470-478
[15]   Pre-pregnancy Body Mass Index, Gestational Weight Gain, and Other Maternal Characteristics in Relation to Infant Birth Weight [J].
Frederick, Ihunnaya O. ;
Williams, Michelle A. ;
Sales, Anne E. ;
Martin, Diane P. ;
Killien, Marcia .
MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2008, 12 (05) :557-567
[16]   Low birth weight and Latino ethnicity - Examining the epidemiologic paradox [J].
FuentesAfflick, E ;
Lurie, P .
ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, 1997, 151 (07) :665-674
[17]   Prenatal risk factors among foreign-born central American women: a comparative study [J].
Gaffney, KF .
PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING, 2000, 17 (06) :415-422
[18]  
Galanti Geri-Ann, 2003, J Transcult Nurs, V14, P180, DOI 10.1177/1043659603014003004
[19]   Perinatal outcomes in two dissimilar immigrant populations in the United States: A dual epidemiologic paradox [J].
Gould, JB ;
Madan, A ;
Qin, C ;
Chavez, G .
PEDIATRICS, 2003, 111 (06) :E676-E682
[20]  
Horman S, 1989, Health Educ, V20, P18