Background population: how does it affect LR-based forensic voice comparison?

被引:15
作者
Kinoshita, Yuko [1 ]
Ishihara, Shunichi [2 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Dept Linguist, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
关键词
FORENSIC VOICE COMPARISON; BACKGROUND POPULATION; LONG TERM FO DISTRIBUTION; LIKELIHOOD RATIO; SPONTANEOUS SPEECH; JAPANESE; FORMANT TRAJECTORIES;
D O I
10.1558/ijsll.v21i2.191
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This article investigates to what extent and in what ways the size of the background population affects the outcome of likelihood ratio (LR) based forensic voice comparison. While sample size is known to affect the accuracy of statistical modelling, specific effects in the context of forensic voice comparison are not yet understood. Forensic voice comparison analysts need to work with limited data, but it is unclear how this might impact on the LR-based evaluation of evidence. In this article, we report LR-based speaker comparison experiments using variously sized datasets for background population. They use features derived from long term F0 distribution. We examined their performance in terms of accuracy (closeness to the true value) and precision (reproducibility).
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 224
页数:34
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Evaluation of trace evidence in the form of multivariate data [J].
Aitken, CGG ;
Lucy, D .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 2004, 53 :109-122
[2]  
Alderman T., 2004, P 10 AUSTR INT C SPE, P177
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, P 8 AUSTR INT C SPEE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Kernel smoothing
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, SST2010
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2002, 9 AUSTR INT C SPEECH
[7]  
Braun A., 1995, Studies in Forensic Phonetics, P9
[8]   Application-independent evaluation of speaker detection [J].
Brümmer, N ;
du Preez, J .
COMPUTER SPEECH AND LANGUAGE, 2006, 20 (2-3) :230-275
[9]  
Burnham D, 2011, 12TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION 2011 (INTERSPEECH 2011), VOLS 1-5, P848
[10]  
Curran J.M., 2005, LAW PROBABILITY & RISK, V4, P115, DOI [10.1093/lpr/mgi009, 10.1093/1pr/mgi009, DOI 10.1093/LPR/MGI009]