Age stratification and cohort effects in scholarly communication: a study of social sciences

被引:32
作者
Sugimoto, Cassidy R. [1 ]
Sugimoto, Thomas J. [2 ]
Tsou, Andrew [1 ]
Milojevic, Stasa [1 ]
Lariviere, Vincent [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Informat & Comp, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Ctr Evaluat & Educ Policy, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[3] Univ Montreal, Ecole Bibliothecon & Sci Informat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Quebec, Observ Sci & Technol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Aging; Cohorts; Scholarly communication; RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY; SCIENTIFIC CAREERS; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; SEX-DIFFERENCES; PATTERNS; COLLABORATION; PUBLICATION; FACULTY; IMPACT; HUMANITIES;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-016-2087-y
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Aging is considered to be an important factor in a scholar's propensity to innovate, produce, and collaborate on high quality work. Yet, empirical studies in the area are rare and plagued with several limitations. As a result, we lack clear evidence on the relationship between aging and scholarly communication activities and impact. To this end, we study the complete publication profiles of more than 1000 authors across three fields-sociology, economics, and political science-to understand the relationship between aging, productivity, collaboration, and impact. Furthermore, we analyze multiple operationalizations of aging, to determine which is more closely related to observable changes in scholarly communication behavior. The study demonstrates that scholars remain highly productive across the life-span of the career (i.e., 40 years), and that productivity increases steeply until promotion to associate professor and then remains stable. Collaboration increases with age and has increased over time. Lastly, a scholar's work obtains its highest impact directly around promotion and then decreases over time. Finally, our results suggest a statistically significant relationship between rank of the scholar and productivity, collaboration, and impact. These results inform our understanding of the scientific workforce and the production of science.
引用
收藏
页码:997 / 1016
页数:20
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [51] MPACT and citation impact: Two sides of the same scholarly coin?
    Sugimoto, Cassidy R.
    Russell, Terrell G.
    Meho, Lokman I.
    Marchionini, Gary
    [J]. LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2008, 30 (04) : 273 - 281
  • [52] Gender differences in scientific productivity: a persisting phenomenon?
    van Arensbergen, Pleun
    van der Weijden, Inge
    van den Besselaar, Peter
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2012, 93 (03) : 857 - 868
  • [53] Whitley R., 2000, The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, V2nd edn
  • [54] The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge
    Wuchty, Stefan
    Jones, Benjamin F.
    Uzzi, Brian
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2007, 316 (5827) : 1036 - 1039
  • [55] Zuckerman H., 1987, Women: Their underrepresentation and career differentials in science and engineering, P127