Quantifying the risks of non-oncology phase I research in healthy volunteers: meta-analysis of phase I studies

被引:45
作者
Emanuel, Ezekiel J. [1 ,2 ]
Bedarida, Gabriella [3 ]
Macci, Kristy [3 ]
Gabler, Nicole B. [4 ]
Rid, Annette [5 ]
Wendler, David [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Med Eth & Hlth Policy, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Off Provost, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Pfizer, New Haven Clin Res Unit, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Kings Coll London, Dept Social Sci Hlth & Med, London WC2R 2LS, England
[6] NIH, Ctr Clin, Dept Bioeth, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2015年 / 350卷
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
ADVERSE EVENTS; CLINICAL-RESEARCH; TRIALS; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.h3271
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To quantify the frequency and seriousness of adverse events in non-oncology phase I studies with healthy participants. Design Meta-analysis of individual, healthy volunteer level data. Setting Phase I studies with healthy volunteers conducted between September 2004 and March 2011 at Pfizer's three dedicated phase I testing sites in Belgium, Singapore, and the United States. These included studies in which drug development was terminated. Participants 11 028 participants who received the study drug in 394 distinct non-oncology phase I studies, which involved 4620 unique individuals. A total of 2460 (53.2%) participants were involved in only one study, whereas others participated in two or more studies. Main outcome measures Adverse events classified as mild, moderate, and severe as well as serious adverse events-defined by the Food and Drug Administration as events that result in death, a life threatening event, admission to hospital, prolongation of existing hospital stay, a persistent or major disability, or a congenital anomaly or birth defect. Pfizer researchers of phase I trials determined adverse events, and serious adverse events were those filed with the FDA. Results Overall, 4000 (36.3%) participants who received the study drug experienced no adverse events and 7028 (63.7%) experienced 24 643 adverse events. Overall, 84.6% (n=20 840) of adverse events were mild and 1.0% (n=255) were severe. 34 (0.31%) serious adverse events occurred among the 11 028 participants who received the study agent, with no deaths or life threatening events. Of the 34 serious adverse events, 11 were related to the study drug and seven to study procedures, whereas 16 were unrelated to a study drug or procedure, including four that occurred when the participant was receiving a placebo. Overall, 24.1% (n=5947) of adverse events were deemed to be unrelated to the study drug. With a total of 143 (36%) studies involving placebo, 10.3% (n=2528) of all adverse events occurred among participants receiving placebo. The most common adverse events were headache (12.2%, n=3017), drowsiness (9.8%, n=2410), and diarrhea (6.9%, n=1698). Research on drugs for neuropsychiatric indications had the highest frequency of adverse events (3015 per 1000 participants). Conclusion Among 11 028 healthy participants who received study drug in non-oncology phase I studies, the majority (85%) of adverse events were mild. 34 (0.31%) serious adverse events occurred, with no life threatening events or deaths. Half of all adverse events were related to the study drug or to procedures. Extrapolation of these data to other types of phase I studies, especially with biological agents, may not be warranted.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, MED RES HIRE POLITIC
[2]   Informative inducement: Study payment as a signal of risk [J].
Cryder, Cynthia E. ;
London, Alex John ;
Volpp, Kevin G. ;
Loewenstein, George .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2010, 70 (03) :455-464
[3]   Exploiting a research underclass in phase 1 clinical trials [J].
Elliott, Carl ;
Abadie, Roberto .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 358 (22) :2316-2317
[4]   What makes clinical research ethical? [J].
Emanuel, EJ ;
Wendler, D ;
Grady, C .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (20) :2701-2711
[5]   Money and distorted ethical judgments about research: Ethical assessment of the TeGenero TGN1412 trial [J].
Emanuel, Ezekiel J. ;
Miller, Franklin G. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2007, 7 (02) :76-81
[6]   Feeding and Bleeding: The Institutional Banalization of Risk to Healthy Volunteers in Phase I Pharmaceutical Clinical Trials [J].
Fisher, Jill A. .
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2015, 40 (02) :199-226
[7]   Risks and benefits of phase 1 oncology trials, 1991 through 2002 [J].
Horstmann, E ;
McCabe, MS ;
Grochow, L ;
Yamamoto, S ;
Rubinstein, L ;
Budd, T ;
Shoemaker, D ;
Emanuel, EJ ;
Grady, C .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (09) :895-904
[8]   Balancing justice and autonomy in clinical research with healthy volunteers [J].
Kass, N. E. ;
Myers, R. ;
Fuchs, E. J. ;
Carson, K. A. ;
Flexner, C. .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2007, 82 (02) :219-227
[9]   A nationwide survey on serious adverse events in healthy volunteer studies in Japan. [J].
Kumagai, Y ;
Fukazawa, I ;
Momma, T ;
Iijima, H ;
Takayanagi, H ;
Takemoto, N ;
Kikuchi, Y .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2006, 79 (02) :P71-P71
[10]  
Lemmens Trudo, 2001, American Journal of Bioethics, V1, P51, DOI 10.1162/152651601300169095