Sexual selection and assortative mating: an experimental test

被引:17
|
作者
Debelle, A. [1 ]
Ritchie, M. G. [2 ]
Snook, R. R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Sch Life Sci, Brighton, E Sussex, England
[2] Univ St Andrews, Sch Biol, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland
[3] Univ Sheffield, Anim & Plant Sci, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Drosophila; experimental evolution; female preference; mate competition; sexual conflict; sexual isolation; speciation; FEMALE MATE CHOICE; DROSOPHILA-PSEUDOOBSCURA; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; EXPERIMENTAL EVOLUTION; MALE SIZE; EXPERIMENTAL MANIPULATION; EXPERIMENTAL REMOVAL; MALE COMPETITION; MELANOGASTER; SPECIATION;
D O I
10.1111/jeb.12855
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Mate choice and mate competition can both influence the evolution of sexual isolation between populations. Assortative mating may arise if traits and preferences diverge in step, and, alternatively, mate competition may counteract mating preferences and decrease assortative mating. Here, we examine potential assortative mating between populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura that have experimentally evolved under either increased ('polyandry') or decreased ('monogamy') sexual selection intensity for 100 generations. These populations have evolved differences in numerous traits, including a male signal and female preference traits. We use a two males: one female design, allowing both mate choice and competition to influence mating outcomes, to test for assortative mating between our populations. Mating latency shows subtle effects of male and female interactions, with females from the monogamous populations appearing reluctant to mate with males from the polyandrous populations. However, males from the polyandrous populations have a significantly higher probability of mating regardless of the female's population. Our results suggest that if populations differ in the intensity of sexual selection, effects on mate competition may overcome mate choice.
引用
收藏
页码:1307 / 1316
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EVOLUTION OF DIVERGENT FEMALE MATING PREFERENCE IN RESPONSE TO EXPERIMENTAL SEXUAL SELECTION
    Debelle, Allan
    Ritchie, Michael G.
    Snook, Rhonda R.
    EVOLUTION, 2014, 68 (09) : 2524 - 2533
  • [2] Assortative mating, sexual selection, and their consequences for gene flow inLittorina
    Perini, Samuel
    Rafajlovic, Marina
    Westram, Anja M.
    Johannesson, Kerstin
    Butlin, Roger K.
    EVOLUTION, 2020, 74 (07) : 1482 - 1497
  • [3] A TEST AND REVIEW OF THE ROLE OF EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE ON EXPERIMENTAL SEXUAL SELECTION PATTERNS
    Snook, Rhonda R.
    Bruestle, Lena
    Slate, Jon
    EVOLUTION, 2009, 63 (07) : 1923 - 1933
  • [4] Diet-based assortative mating through sexual imprinting
    Delaney, Emily K.
    Hoekstra, Hopi E.
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2019, 9 (21): : 12045 - 12050
  • [5] Experimental sexual selection reveals rapid evolutionary divergence in sex-specific transcriptomes and their interactions following mating
    Veltsos, Paris
    Porcelli, Damiano
    Fang, Yongxiang
    Cossins, Andrew R.
    Ritchie, Michael G.
    Snook, Rhonda R.
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2022, 31 (12) : 3374 - 3388
  • [6] Assortative Mating in Fallow Deer Reduces the Strength of Sexual Selection
    Farrell, Mary E.
    Briefer, Elodie
    McElligott, Alan G.
    PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (04):
  • [7] Unifying quantification methods for sexual selection and assortative mating using information theory
    Carvajal-Rodriguez, A.
    THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 2024, 158 : 206 - 215
  • [8] Does adaptation to different diets result in assortative mating? Ambiguous results from experiments on Drosophila
    Belkina, Elena G.
    Naimark, Elena B.
    Gorshkova, Anastasiya A.
    Markov, Alexander V.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2018, 31 (12) : 1803 - 1814
  • [9] Experimental evolution: Assortative mating and sexual selection, independent of local adaptation, lead to reproductive isolation in the nematode Caenorhabditis remanei
    Castillo, Dean M.
    Burger, Melissa K.
    Lively, Curtis M.
    Delph, Lynda F.
    EVOLUTION, 2015, 69 (12) : 3141 - 3155
  • [10] Geography, assortative mating, and the effects of sexual selection on speciation with gene flow
    Servedio, Maria R.
    EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS, 2016, 9 (01): : 91 - 102