Ovarian response and pregnancy outcome in poorresponder women:: a randomized controlled trial on the effect of luteinizing hormone supplementation on in vitro fertilization cycles

被引:62
作者
Barrenetxea, Gorka [1 ,2 ]
Agirregoikoa, Jon Ander [2 ]
Jimenez, Maria Rosario [2 ]
de larruzea, Arantza Lopez [2 ]
Ganzabal, Teresa [2 ]
Carbonero, Koldo [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basque Country, Euskal Herriko Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bilbao 48010, Spain
[2] Ctr Reprod Med & Infertil Quiron Bilbao, Bilbao, Spain
关键词
controlled trial; prospective study; IVF ovarian stimulation; gonadotropin stimulation; poor responder; ovarian ageing; implantation rate; pregnancy rate; LH supplementation;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.088
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To prospectively assess the effect of using a combination of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) and recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH) on ovarian stimulation parameters and treatment outcome among poor-responder patients. Design: Prospective randomized trial. Setting: University-associated private medical center. Patient(s): Eighty-four patients who had a basal FSH level of >= 10 mIU/mL, who were >= 40 years of age, and who were undergoing their first IVF cycle participated in this controlled trial. Intervention(s): Patients were randomly allocated into two study groups: group A, in which ovarian stimulation included GnRH analogue and rFSH and rLH, and group B, in which patients received GnRH analogue and rFSH without further LH addition. Main Outcome Measure(s): Primary outcome measures included the ongoing pregnancy rate per retrieval and implantation rate per embryo transferred. The number of days of gonadotropin treatment, E-2 level on rHCG administration day, number of developed follicles, number of retrieved oocytes, number of normally fertilized zygotes (at the two-pronuclear [2PN] stage), cumulative embryo score, and number of transferred embryos were also evaluated. Result(s): The overall pregnancy rate was 22.61% (19 pregnancies among 84 couples). The pregnancy wastage rate was 30.00% in group A and 22.22% in group B. There were no differences in either primary or secondary end points. Conclusion(s): The results of this prospective and randomized trial show that the addition of rLH at a given time of follicular development produces no further benefit in the patient population of our study. A reduced ovarian response cannot be overcome by changes in the stimulation protocol.
引用
收藏
页码:546 / 553
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Follicle-stimulating hormone or human menopausal gonadotropin for ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization cycles: a meta-analysis
    Agrawal, R
    Holmes, J
    Jacobs, HS
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 73 (02) : 338 - 343
  • [2] Comparison of agonistic flare-up-protocol and antagonistic multiple dose protocol in ovarian stimulation of poor responders: results of a prospective randomized trial
    Akman, MA
    Erden, HF
    Tosun, SB
    Bayazit, N
    Aksoy, E
    Bahceci, M
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (05) : 868 - 870
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1998, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, V83, P1507
  • [4] Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols for in vitro fertilization: two decades of experience after the birth of Elizabeth Carr
    Arslan, M
    Bocca, S
    Mirkin, S
    Barroso, G
    Stadtmauer, L
    Oehninger, S
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 84 (03) : 555 - 569
  • [5] Is luteinizing hormone needed for optimal ovulation induction?
    Balasch, J
    Fábregues, F
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 14 (03) : 265 - 274
  • [6] Suppression of LH during ovarian stimulation:: analysing threshold values and effects on ovarian response and the outcome of assisted reproduction in down-regulated women stimulated with recombinant FSH
    Balasch, J
    Vidal, E
    Peñarrubia, J
    Casamitjana, R
    Carmona, F
    Creus, M
    Fábregues, F
    Vanrell, JA
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (08) : 1636 - 1643
  • [7] Blastocyst culture after repeated failure of cleavage-stage embryo transfers:: a comparison of day 5 and day 6 transfers
    Barrenetxea, G
    de Larruzea, AL
    Ganzabal, T
    Jiménez, R
    Carbonero, K
    Mandiola, M
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 83 (01) : 49 - 53
  • [8] Outcome of in-vitro fertilization through natural cycles in poor responders
    Bassil, S
    Godin, PA
    Donnez, J
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 (05) : 1262 - 1265
  • [9] Recombinant LH in ovarian stimulation
    Caglar, GS
    Asimakopoulos, B
    Nikolettos, N
    Diedrich, K
    Al-Hasani, S
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2005, 10 (06) : 774 - 785
  • [10] Evaluating the role of exogenous luteinizing hormone in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists
    Chung, K
    Krey, L
    Katz, J
    Noyes, N
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 84 (02) : 313 - 318