Distal femoral fractures The need to review the standard of care

被引:90
作者
Smith, James R. A. [1 ]
Halliday, Ruth [1 ]
Aquilina, Alexander L. [2 ]
Morrison, Rory J. M. [3 ]
Yip, Grace C. K. [4 ]
McArthur, John [2 ]
Hull, Peter [4 ]
Gray, Andrew [3 ]
Kelly, Michael B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Southmead Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Bristol BS10 5NB, Avon, England
[2] Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Coventry CV2 2DX, W Midlands, England
[3] Royal Victoria Infirm, Dept Orthopaed, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 4LP, Tyne & Wear, England
[4] Cambridge Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Addenbrooks Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2015年 / 46卷 / 06期
关键词
Distal femoral; Fracture; Femur; Supracondylar; FEMUR FRACTURES; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; LOCKING PLATES; HIP FRACTURE; FIXATION; MORTALITY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES; NAIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2015.02.016
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Hip fracture care has evolved, largely due to standardisation of practice, measurement of outcomes and the introduction of the Best Practice Tariff, leading to the sustained improvements documented by the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD). The treatment of distal femoral fractures in this population has not had the same emphasis. This study defines the epidemiology, current practice and outcomes of distal femoral fractures in four English centres. Patients and methods: 105 patients aged 50 years or greater with a distal femoral fracture, presenting to four UK major trauma centres between October 2010 and September 2011 were identified. Data was collected using an adapted NHFD data collection tool via retrospective case note and radiograph review. Local ethics approval was obtained. Results: Mean age was 77 years (range 50-99), with 86% female. 95% of injuries were sustained from a low energy mechanism, and 72% were classified as either 33-A1 or 33-C1. The mean Parker mobility score and Barthel Independence Index were 5.37 (0-9) and 75.5 (0-100) respectively. Operative management was performed in 84%, and 86% had their surgery within 36 h. Three quarters were fixed with a peri-articuar locking plate. There was no consensus on post operative rehabilitation, but no excess of complications in the centres where weight bearing as tolerated was the standard. 45% were seen by an orthogeriatrician during their admission. Mean length of stay was 29 days. Mortality at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year was 7%, 16% and 18% respectively. Discussion: This study demonstrates that the distal femoral and hip fracture populations are similar, and highlights the current disparity in their management. The metrics and standards of care currently applied to hip fractures should be applied to the treatment of distal femoral fractures. Optimal operative treatment and rehabilitation remains unclear, and is in need of further research. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1084 / 1088
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The use of knee mega-prosthesis for the management of distal femoral fractures: A systematic review
    Meluzio, M. C.
    Oliva, M. S.
    Minutillo, F.
    Ziranu, A.
    Saccomanno, M. F.
    Maccauro, G.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2020, 51 : S17 - S22
  • [42] FUNCTIONAL EVOLUTION OF PROXIMAL FEMORAL END FRACTURES
    Rocha, Murilo Antonio
    Azer, Helder William
    Nascimento, Valdenia das Gracas
    ACTA ORTOPEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2009, 17 (01): : 17 - 21
  • [43] Ipsilateral proximal and shaft femoral fractures: Is there a better therapeutic option? Review
    Berrueta, Facundo del Campo
    Tamon, Nicolas
    ANALES DE LA FACULTAD DE MEDICINA-UNIVERSIDAD DE LA REPUBLICA URUGUAY, 2020, 7 (02):
  • [44] Internal Fixation Versus Hemiarthroplasty for Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sattari, Shahab Aldin
    Guilbault, Ryan
    MacMahon, Aoife
    Salem, Hytham S. S.
    Khanuja, Harpal S. S.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2023, 37 (05) : E219 - E226
  • [45] Double Plating Fixation vs Distal Femoral Replacement in the Management of Distal Femoral Fractures in Geriatric Patients
    Gendya, Amr Gamaleldin Mahmoud Khalil
    El-Zaher, El-Zaher Hassan
    Zakaria, Zeiad Mohamed
    Awad, Mohamed El Sayed
    Metwaly, Radwan Gamal Eldeen Abdelhamid
    ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2023, 20
  • [46] Distal femoral replacement for the treatment of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures around a total knee arthroplasty: a metaanalysis
    Wood, Matthew J.
    Al-Jabri, Talal
    Stelzhammer, Thomas
    Brivio, Angela
    Donaldson, James
    Skinner, John A.
    Barrett, David
    ORTHOPEDIC REVIEWS, 2024, 16
  • [47] Comparison of Retrograde Femoral Interlocking Nail Versus Dynamic Condylar Screw in Distal Femoral Shaft Fractures
    Shafi, Muhammad Kamran
    Noor, Fraz
    Zeb, Syed Alam
    Ishfaq, Muhammad
    Bin Tahir, Yousaf
    Khan, Tauqeer Nawaz
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2021, 15 (06): : 2145 - 2148
  • [48] The effect of surgeon-controlled variables on construct stiffness in lateral locked plating of distal femoral fractures
    Weaver, Michael J.
    Chaus, George W.
    Masoudi, Aidin
    Momenzadeh, Kaveh
    Mohamadi, Amin
    Rodriguez, Edward K.
    Vrahas, Mark S.
    Nazarian, Ara
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [49] Distal Femoral Replacement for Periprosthetic Fractures After TKA: Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Review
    Aebischer, Andrea S.
    Hau, Raphael
    de Steiger, Richard N.
    Holder, Carl
    Wall, Christopher J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (07) : 1354 - 1358
  • [50] Weightbearing versus non-weight bearing in geriatric distal femoral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wardle, Blaise
    Lynch, Joseph T.
    Staniforth, Thomas
    Ward, Thomas
    Smith, Paul
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2024, 50 (06) : 2807 - 2818