An ethical analysis of the policy implications in the united states emerging from the relationship between human genomics and embryonic stem cell research

被引:0
作者
Magill, G [1 ]
机构
[1] St Louis Univ, Ctr Hlth Care Eth, St Louis, MO 63104 USA
来源
ETHICS OF HUMAN GENETICS: CHALLENGES OF THE (POST) GENOMIC ERA | 2002年
关键词
cloning; ethics; genomics; human subjects' protection; patient safety; policy; stem cell research;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The paper discusses the policy implications that emerge from an ethical analysis of respect for human life in human genomics and embryonic stem cells. First, breakthroughs in human genomics raise many ethics concerns for human life. The death of the first patient in a gene therapy trial in 1999 gave prominence to a concern about patient safety in human genomics research. Second, the announcement of President Bush in August 2001 to permit federally funded research for medical therapies on a limited number of embryonic stem cells lines generated widespread debate about the meaning of embryonic human life. However, respecting human life in each area appears to yield opposing results. That is, respect for the value of human life in genomics research is articulated in terms of strict regulatory measures to protect patient safety; whereas, respect for the value of human life in embryonic stem cell research can entail a policy trajectory that seems tolerant of the destruction of some human embryos. Public policy must seek a coherent resolution of these bipolar propensities.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 201
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Cloning and the US Congress [J].
Annas, GJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (20) :1599-1602
[2]  
ANNAS GJ, 2001, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V286, P2327
[3]  
[Anonymous], MATTER LIFE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, RES INV HUM BIOL MAT
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1979, DHEW PUBL
[6]  
Brainard J., 2001, CHRONICLE HIGHE 1130, pA20
[7]  
CASSELL JH, 2001, U MICH J L REFORM, V34, P547
[8]  
CHARO RA, 2001, BUSHS STEM CELL COMP, P6
[9]  
*DEP HHS, 2000, NAT I HLTH GUID RES
[10]  
Doerflinger R, 2001, Natl Cathol Bioeth Q, V1, P135