Extra-abdominal removal of placenta during cesarean section: a prospective randomized controlled trial of a novel technique

被引:5
|
作者
Kaya, Baris [1 ]
Guralp, Onur [2 ]
Daglar, Korkut [3 ]
Tuten, Abdullah [4 ]
Demirol, Aygul [1 ]
Yayci, Eyup [1 ]
Atacag, Tijen [1 ]
Dogan, Askin [5 ]
机构
[1] Near East Univ, Lefkosa TRNC, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fac Med, Mersin 10, Turkey
[2] Klinikum Oldenburg Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Oldenburg, Germany
[3] Zekai Tahir Burak Womens Hlth & Res Hosp, Ankara, Turkey
[4] Istanbul Univ, Cerrahpasa Med Sch, Obstet & Gynecol, Istanbul, Turkey
[5] Univ Jena, Obstet & Gynecol, Jena, Germany
关键词
Cesarean section; extra-abdominal placental removal; placental delivery; PERIOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; UTERINE EXTERIORIZATION; ADHESION PREVENTION; MANUAL REMOVAL; BLOOD-LOSS; DELIVERY; REPAIR;
D O I
10.1515/jpm-2015-0330
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aim: To evaluate intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes of a novel placenta delivery technique; extra-abdominal removal vs. intra-abdominal removal of the placenta during cesarean section (CS). Methods: A total of 210 women delivering by CS at term in a tertiary university hospital between March 2014 and January 2015 were randomized to extra-abdominal removal vs. intra-abdominal removal of the placenta. The women were randomly allocated to the extra-(group 1) or intra-abdominal removal group (group 2) according to random sampling method, where women with even and odd numbers were allocated to intra- and extra-abdominal groups, respectively. The amount of intra-abdominal hemorrhagic fluid accumulation, the duration of operation and estimated blood loss during operation were the primary outcomes. The secondary outcomes included the mean difference between pre- and post-operative hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, the mean postoperative pain score, any additional need of analgesia, postoperative bowel function, postoperative endometritis and wound infections. Results: The amount of aspirated hemorrhagic fluid was significantly higher in the intra-abdominal group compared to the extra-abdominal group (34.6 +/- 22.2 mL vs. 9.4 +/- 4.8 mL, P<0.001). Mean duration of the operation, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative requirement of additional analgesia, postoperative pain scores, postoperative endometritis or wound infection, and length of hospital stay were not significantly different between the intra-and extra-abdominal placental removal groups. Conclusion: By extra-abdominal removal of the placenta, the accumulation of bloody fluid in the abdominal cavity is significantly less compared to the intra-abdominal removal method, which, in turn, provides avoidance of excessive mounted-gauze use, intra-abdominal manipulations, or iatrogenic trauma.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 565
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spontaneous delivery or manual removal of the placenta during cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial
    Ajay, Gahlot
    Suman, A.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2009, 59 (02): : 127 - 130
  • [2] EXTRA-ABDOMINAL UTERINE EXTERIORIZATION AT CESAREAN-SECTION
    HERSHEY, DW
    QUILLIGAN, EJ
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1978, 52 (02): : 189 - 192
  • [3] Comparison of the Intra-abdominal and Extra-abdominal Techniques in the Repair of Cesarean Section Incision
    Nihat Farisoğullari
    Ramazan Denizli
    Bedri Sakcak
    Nayif Çiçekli
    Zeki Doğan
    SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine, 5 (1)
  • [4] Manual removal versus spontaneous delivery of the placenta at cesarean section in developing countries: a randomized controlled trial and review of literature
    Kamel, Ahmed
    El-Mazny, Akmal
    Salah, Emad
    Ramadan, Wafaa
    Hussein, Ahmed M.
    Hany, Ayman
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2018, 31 (24): : 3308 - 3313
  • [5] Dilatation or no dilatation of the cervix during cesarean section (Dondi Trial): a randomized controlled trial
    Kirscht, Jade
    Weiss, Christel
    Nickol, Jana
    Berlit, Sebastian
    Tuschy, Benjamin
    Hoch, Benjamin
    Trebin, Amelie-Verena
    Grosse-Steffen, Thomas
    Suetterlin, Marc
    Kehl, Sven
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2017, 295 (01) : 39 - 43
  • [6] Dilatation or no dilatation of the cervix during cesarean section (Dondi Trial): a randomized controlled trial
    Jade Kirscht
    Christel Weiss
    Jana Nickol
    Sebastian Berlit
    Benjamin Tuschy
    Benjamin Hoch
    Amelie-Verena Trebin
    Thomas Große-Steffen
    Marc Sütterlin
    Sven Kehl
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2017, 295 : 39 - 43
  • [7] Comparison of extra-peritoneal cesarean section with conventional trans-peritoneal cesarean section: An open label randomized controlled trial
    Khoiwal, Kavita
    Sheoran, Deepika
    Mishra, Ramya
    Gaurav, Amrita
    Chaturvedi, Jaya
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY-X, 2023, 19
  • [8] The Use of Abdominal Binders in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
    Myers, Jennifer R.
    Gillier, Christin M.
    Kriner, Ronald M.
    Constant, Ann D.
    Wetzel, Laura A.
    Anasti, James N.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 : 160S - 160S
  • [9] Anesthetic management of cesarean section in cases of placenta accreta, with versus without abdominal aortic balloon occlusion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Chu, Qinjun
    Shen, Dan
    He, Long
    Wang, Hongwei
    Zhao, Xianlan
    Chen, Zhimin
    Wang, Yanli
    Zhang, Wei
    TRIALS, 2017, 18 : 240
  • [10] Anesthetic management of cesarean section in cases of placenta accreta, with versus without abdominal aortic balloon occlusion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Qinjun Chu
    Dan Shen
    Long He
    Hongwei Wang
    Xianlan Zhao
    Zhimin Chen
    Yanli Wang
    Wei Zhang
    Trials, 18