Extra-abdominal removal of placenta during cesarean section: a prospective randomized controlled trial of a novel technique

被引:5
|
作者
Kaya, Baris [1 ]
Guralp, Onur [2 ]
Daglar, Korkut [3 ]
Tuten, Abdullah [4 ]
Demirol, Aygul [1 ]
Yayci, Eyup [1 ]
Atacag, Tijen [1 ]
Dogan, Askin [5 ]
机构
[1] Near East Univ, Lefkosa TRNC, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fac Med, Mersin 10, Turkey
[2] Klinikum Oldenburg Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Oldenburg, Germany
[3] Zekai Tahir Burak Womens Hlth & Res Hosp, Ankara, Turkey
[4] Istanbul Univ, Cerrahpasa Med Sch, Obstet & Gynecol, Istanbul, Turkey
[5] Univ Jena, Obstet & Gynecol, Jena, Germany
关键词
Cesarean section; extra-abdominal placental removal; placental delivery; PERIOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; UTERINE EXTERIORIZATION; ADHESION PREVENTION; MANUAL REMOVAL; BLOOD-LOSS; DELIVERY; REPAIR;
D O I
10.1515/jpm-2015-0330
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aim: To evaluate intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes of a novel placenta delivery technique; extra-abdominal removal vs. intra-abdominal removal of the placenta during cesarean section (CS). Methods: A total of 210 women delivering by CS at term in a tertiary university hospital between March 2014 and January 2015 were randomized to extra-abdominal removal vs. intra-abdominal removal of the placenta. The women were randomly allocated to the extra-(group 1) or intra-abdominal removal group (group 2) according to random sampling method, where women with even and odd numbers were allocated to intra- and extra-abdominal groups, respectively. The amount of intra-abdominal hemorrhagic fluid accumulation, the duration of operation and estimated blood loss during operation were the primary outcomes. The secondary outcomes included the mean difference between pre- and post-operative hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, the mean postoperative pain score, any additional need of analgesia, postoperative bowel function, postoperative endometritis and wound infections. Results: The amount of aspirated hemorrhagic fluid was significantly higher in the intra-abdominal group compared to the extra-abdominal group (34.6 +/- 22.2 mL vs. 9.4 +/- 4.8 mL, P<0.001). Mean duration of the operation, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative requirement of additional analgesia, postoperative pain scores, postoperative endometritis or wound infection, and length of hospital stay were not significantly different between the intra-and extra-abdominal placental removal groups. Conclusion: By extra-abdominal removal of the placenta, the accumulation of bloody fluid in the abdominal cavity is significantly less compared to the intra-abdominal removal method, which, in turn, provides avoidance of excessive mounted-gauze use, intra-abdominal manipulations, or iatrogenic trauma.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 565
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spontaneous delivery or manual removal of the placenta during cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial
    Ajay, Gahlot
    Suman, A.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2009, 59 (02) : 127 - 130
  • [2] Comparison of the Intra-abdominal and Extra-abdominal Techniques in the Repair of Cesarean Section Incision
    Nihat Farisoğullari
    Ramazan Denizli
    Bedri Sakcak
    Nayif Çiçekli
    Zeki Doğan
    SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine, 5 (1)
  • [3] Manual Removal versus Spontaneous Delivery of the Placenta at Cesarean Section: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Yang, Meng-Chang
    Li, Peng
    Su, Wen-Jie
    Jiang, Rong
    Deng, Jia
    Wang, Ru-Rong
    Huang, Chao-Li
    THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2021, 17 : 1283 - 1293
  • [4] How can methods of placental delivery in cesarean section affect perioperative blood loss? A randomized controlled trial of controlled cord traction versus manual removal of placenta
    Altraigey, Ahmed
    Ellaithy, Mohamed
    Atia, Hytham
    Ali, Ibrahim
    Kolkailah, Mohamed
    Abbas, Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2019, 45 (01) : 133 - 140
  • [5] Dilatation or no dilatation of the cervix during cesarean section (Dondi Trial): a randomized controlled trial
    Kirscht, Jade
    Weiss, Christel
    Nickol, Jana
    Berlit, Sebastian
    Tuschy, Benjamin
    Hoch, Benjamin
    Trebin, Amelie-Verena
    Grosse-Steffen, Thomas
    Suetterlin, Marc
    Kehl, Sven
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2017, 295 (01) : 39 - 43
  • [6] Manual removal versus spontaneous delivery of the placenta at cesarean section in developing countries: a randomized controlled trial and review of literature
    Kamel, Ahmed
    El-Mazny, Akmal
    Salah, Emad
    Ramadan, Wafaa
    Hussein, Ahmed M.
    Hany, Ayman
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2018, 31 (24) : 3308 - 3313
  • [7] Comparison of cell salvage with one and two suction devices during cesarean section in patients with placenta previa and/or accrete: a randomized controlled trial
    Chen Hong
    Tan Hua
    Luo Pei-Xin
    Shen Yi-Fang
    Lyu Chang-Cheng
    Qian Xiao-Wei
    Chen Xin-Zhong
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 133 (06) : 638 - 643
  • [8] Dilatation or no dilatation of the cervix during cesarean section (Dondi Trial): a randomized controlled trial
    Jade Kirscht
    Christel Weiss
    Jana Nickol
    Sebastian Berlit
    Benjamin Tuschy
    Benjamin Hoch
    Amelie-Verena Trebin
    Thomas Große-Steffen
    Marc Sütterlin
    Sven Kehl
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2017, 295 : 39 - 43
  • [9] Comparison of extra-peritoneal cesarean section with conventional trans-peritoneal cesarean section: An open label randomized controlled trial
    Khoiwal, Kavita
    Sheoran, Deepika
    Mishra, Ramya
    Gaurav, Amrita
    Chaturvedi, Jaya
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY-X, 2023, 19
  • [10] Early versus delayed removal of indwelling catheters in patients after elective cesarean section: a prospective randomized trial
    Basbug, Alper
    Yuksel, Alpaslan
    Kaya, Aski Ellibes
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (01) : 68 - 72