A Randomized, One-Year Clinical Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Topiramate, Flunarizine, and a Combination of Flunarizine and Topiramate in Migraine Prophylaxis

被引:39
作者
Luo, Ning [1 ]
Di, Wei [1 ]
Zhang, Aiwu [2 ]
Wang, Ying [1 ]
Ding, Minghui [3 ]
Qi, Weiwei
Zhu, Yingting
Massing, Mark W. [4 ]
Fang, Yannan [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Zhongshan Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Zhongshan Sch Med, Dept Emergency, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Rehabil, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Carolinas Ctr Med Excellence, Cary, NC USA
关键词
Migraine; Prophylaxis; Combination Therapy; Topiramate; Flunarizine; DOUBLE-BLIND; SODIUM VALPROATE; PREVENTION; PROPRANOLOL; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01295.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objectives. The objective of this study was to observe the efficacy, safety, and side effects of a combination of flunarizine plus topiramate compared with either flunarizine and or toparamate alone for migraine prophylaxis. Methods. Out of 150 patients with migraine recruited into the study and randomly assigned to one of three conditions, 126 completed the trial in their group: flunarizine (39), topiramate (44), and flunarizine plus topiramate (43). Patient information was assessed at enrollment and at follow-up visits at the end of months 1-3, 6, 9, and 12. The primary measure of efficacy reduction in mean monthly migraine frequency of at least 50% as compared with baseline. Secondary efficacy parameters included reduction in mean monthly migraine days and severity of headache. Side effects were compared in the three groups by recording adverse reactions and weight changes. Results. The proportion whose monthly headache frequency decreased more than 50% was 66.7% (26/39) in the flunarizine group, 72.7% (32/44) in the topiramate group and 76.7% (33/43) in the combination group, respectively (P = 0.593). The mean monthly days and severity of headache in the three groups also declined and was more significant in the flunarizine plus topiramate group than in the flunarizine group and the topiramate group (P < 0.05). In the flunarizine group, the average weight change was 0.6 kg. Topiramate was associated with a mean weight loss was of -0.9 kg in the topiramate group and -0.2 kg in the flunarizine plus topiramate group. Conclusion. Flunarizine, topiramate, and the combination of flunarizine with topiramate are all effective and have good tolerability in migraine prophylaxis. Adding topiramate to flunarizine may reduce the latter's impact on body weight.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 86
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] BETA-ADRENOCEPTOR BLOCKERS AND CALCIUM-ANTAGONISTS IN THE PROPHYLAXIS AND TREATMENT OF MIGRAINE
    ANDERSSON, KE
    VINGE, E
    [J]. DRUGS, 1990, 39 (03) : 355 - 373
  • [2] A double-blind, randomized trial of low-dose topiramate vs propranolol in migraine prophylaxis
    Ashtari, F.
    Shaygannejad, V.
    Akbari, M.
    [J]. ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2008, 118 (05): : 301 - 305
  • [3] Topiramate for migraine prevention - A randomized controlled trial
    Brandes, JL
    Saper, JR
    Diamond, M
    Couch, JR
    Lewis, DW
    Schmitt, J
    Neto, W
    Schwabe, S
    Jacobs, D
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (08): : 965 - 973
  • [4] PLACEBO-EFFECT AND CLINICAL-TRIALS IN MIGRAINE THERAPY
    COUCH, JR
    [J]. NEUROEPIDEMIOLOGY, 1987, 6 (04) : 178 - 185
  • [5] Cessation versus continuation of 6-month migraine preventive therapy with topiramate (PROMPT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Diener, Hans-Christoph
    Agosti, Reto
    Allais, Gianni
    Bergmans, Paul
    Bussone, Gennaro
    Davies, Brendan
    Ertas, Mustafa
    Lanteri-Minet, Michel
    Reuter, Uwe
    Del Rio, Margarita Sdnchez
    Schoenen, Jean
    Schwalen, Susanne
    van Oene, Joop
    [J]. LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2007, 6 (12) : 1054 - 1062
  • [6] Topiramate in migraine prophylaxis -: Results from a placebo-controlled trial with propranolol as an active control
    Diener, HC
    Tfelt-Hansen, P
    Dahlöf, C
    Láinez, MJA
    Sandrini, G
    Wang, SJ
    Neto, W
    Vijapurkar, U
    Doyle, A
    Jacobs, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2004, 251 (08) : 943 - 950
  • [7] Efficacy and tolerability in migraine prophylaxis of flunarizine in reduced doses: a comparison with propranolol 160 mg daily
    Diener, HC
    Matias-Guiu, J
    Hartung, E
    Pfaffenrath, V
    Ludin, HP
    Nappi, G
    de Beukelaar, F
    [J]. CEPHALALGIA, 2002, 22 (03) : 209 - 221
  • [8] Dodick D W, 2001, Clin Cornerstone, V4, P36, DOI 10.1016/S1098-3597(01)90038-9
  • [9] The clinical spectrum of familial hemiplegic migraine associated with mutations in a neuronal calcium channel.
    Ducros, A
    Denier, C
    Joutel, A
    Cecillon, M
    Lescoat, C
    Vahedi, K
    Darcel, F
    Vicaut, E
    Bousser, M
    Tournier-Lasserve, E
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (01) : 17 - U5
  • [10] Race, ethnicity and pain
    Edwards, CL
    Fillingim, RB
    Keefe, F
    [J]. PAIN, 2001, 94 (02) : 133 - 137