Child development in foster family care - what really counts?

被引:3
|
作者
Kekoni, Taru [1 ]
Miettinen, Janissa [1 ]
Hakala, Niina [2 ]
Savolainen, Anssi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Eastern Finland, Dept Social Sci, Kuopio, Finland
[2] Natl Inst Hlth & Welf, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Foster family care; child welfare; child development; bioecological theory of human development; integrative literature review; PERMANENCY OUTCOMES; PLACEMENT OUTCOMES; WELFARE SAMPLE; KINSHIP; ADOPTION; ECOLOGY; HOME;
D O I
10.1080/13691457.2017.1357023
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Previous research has demonstrated that children who grow up in foster family care - along with other child welfare recipients - manage less well in adulthood compared to those children who do not. Given this challenge, this integrative literature review locates the critical factors that either positively or negatively affect a child's development in foster family care. The articles were analysed using theory-driven content classification in relation to Bronfenbrenner's bioecological framework on child development. The results of the review suggest that there is a wide range of factors that could impact on a child's development in foster family care. Child-related factors such as the child's age, gender, behavioural or mental health problems, etc. were mentioned most often in the data. Micro-environmental factors are also essential to a child's development. Linkages taking place between two or more of the child's circumstances, such as the relationship between the child's birth and foster families and between the foster family and the social worker, were also identified as being influential. Service usage and political and legislative factors, as well as attitudes towards children in care, were also indicated to be strongly influential. It is suggested that the factors identified in this review should be carefully considered as important aspects of care for fostered children and care documentation.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 120
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The complex relationship between sibling contact and child and family well-being in foster care: An exploration of child and family functioning in a pre-permanency cohort
    Herbster, Julia M.
    Ocasio, Kerrie
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2021, 131
  • [2] Be(com)ing Family: A Systematic Review of Stakeholders' Perspectives on Family in Family Foster Care
    Wulleman, Lara
    Grietens, Hans
    Noens, Ilse
    Vliegen, Nicole
    CHILD & FAMILY SOCIAL WORK, 2025,
  • [3] Child Maltreatment and Foster Care
    Gelles R.J.
    Gender Issues, 2006, 23 (4) : 36 - 47
  • [4] No Child Left Behind in Foster Care
    Meehan, Brian
    Hakim, Simon D.
    Blackstone, Erwin A.
    INDEPENDENT REVIEW, 2021, 26 (03) : 451 - 465
  • [5] Three models of collaborative child protection: what is their influence on short stays in foster care?
    Garcia, Antonio
    Puckett, Alan
    Ezell, Mark
    Pecora, Peter J.
    Tanoury, Theresa
    Rodriguez, Wenceslao
    CHILD & FAMILY SOCIAL WORK, 2014, 19 (02) : 125 - 135
  • [6] Placement stability: What role do the different types of family foster care play?
    Chateauneuf, Doris
    Poitras, Karine
    Simard, Marie-Claude
    Buisson, Camille
    CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 2022, 130
  • [7] Leaving foster care - the influence of child and case characteristics on foster care exit rates
    Connell, CM
    Katz, KH
    Saunders, L
    Tebes, JK
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2006, 28 (07) : 780 - 798
  • [8] Family Involvement in Treatment Foster Care
    Southerland, Dannia
    Burns, Barbara
    Farmer, Elizabeth
    Wagner, H.
    Simpson, Ashley
    RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT FOR CHILDREN & YOUTH, 2014, 31 (01) : 2 - 16
  • [9] The development of foster family care in post-Communist countries The experience of Lithuania
    Snieskiene, Dalija
    ADOPTION AND FOSTERING, 2009, 33 (04) : 34 - 43
  • [10] Adversity and Adjustment in Children in Institutions, Family Foster Care, and Adoption
    Jimenez-Morago, Jesus M.
    Leon, Esperanza
    Roman, Maite
    SPANISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 18 : E45