Teachers Helping EFL Students Improve Their Writing Through Written Feedback: The Case of Native and Non-native English-Speaking Teachers' Beliefs

被引:12
作者
Cheng, Xiaolong [1 ]
Zhang, Lawrence Jun [2 ]
机构
[1] Hubei Univ Technol, Sch Foreign Languages, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Auckland, Fac Educ & Social Work, Auckland, New Zealand
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2022年 / 13卷
关键词
native English-speaking teachers; non-native English-speaking teachers; teachers' beliefs; written feedback; EFL writing; CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK; CHINESE; 2ND-LANGUAGE; PERCEPTIONS; KNOWLEDGE; ACCURACY; WRITERS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2022.804313
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Although the efficacy of teacher written feedback has been widely investigated, relatively few studies have been conducted from feedback practitioners' perspectives to investigate teachers' beliefs regarding it, particularly compare beliefs held by teachers with different sociocultural and linguistic backgrounds. Consequently, much remains to be known about teachers' conceptions about written feedback, who has different first languages (L1). To bridge such a gap, we conducted this qualitative study to examine the similarities and differences between native English-speaking (NES) and non-native English-speaking (NNES) teachers' beliefs in Chinese University EFL settings. We analyzed the in-depth interviews with eight teachers through thematic analysis. The findings showed that NES and NNES teachers espoused a range of beliefs in relation to the five themes of written feedback: Purpose, scope, focus, strategy, and orientation. While they shared similar beliefs with regard to feedback focus, their beliefs differed in terms of feedback scope. Important implications are discussed for educational practices.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 116 条
[1]  
Alkhatib N., 2015, Written Corrective Feedback at a Saudi University: English Language Teachers' Beliefs, Students' Preferences, and Teachers' Practices
[2]   INVESTIGATING TEACHERS' WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK PRACTICES IN A SAUDI EFL CONTEXT: HOW DO THEY ALIGN WITH THEIR BELIEFS, INSTITUTIONAL GUIDELINES, AND STUDENTS' PREFERENCES? [J].
Alshahrani, Abdulaziz ;
Storch, Neomy .
AUSTRALIAN REVIEW OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2014, 37 (02) :101-122
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Journal of Second Language Writing, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00038-8, 10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00038-8]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1986, UTILIZATION FOCUSED
[5]   A Comparative Study of the Use of Affective Markers in Supervision Comments: Case of Native versus Non-native Supervision Comments [J].
Ashtarian, Soroor ;
Weisi, Hiwa .
RELC JOURNAL, 2016, 47 (02) :161-173
[6]  
Bao C., 2016, NZ STUD APPL LINGUIS, V22, P35
[7]   Oral corrective feedback in L2 Chinese classes: Teachers' beliefs versus their practices [J].
Bao, Rui .
SYSTEM, 2019, 82 :140-150
[8]  
Bitchener J., 2012, WRITTEN FEEDBACK 2 L, DOI [10.4324/9780203832400, DOI 10.4324/9780203832400]
[9]  
Bitchener J., 2016, Multilingual Matters, DOI DOI 10.21832/9781783095056
[10]   The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students [J].
Bitchener, John ;
Knoch, Ute .
LANGUAGE TEACHING RESEARCH, 2008, 12 (03) :409-431